1 00:00:09,240 --> 00:00:11,480 LAWRENCE: It's my pleasure to welcome you all back 2 00:00:11,480 --> 00:00:13,760 and to see that we continue to have 3 00:00:13,760 --> 00:00:16,160 wonderful participation in the conference, 4 00:00:16,160 --> 00:00:18,800 which we thank all the participants. 5 00:00:18,800 --> 00:00:22,760 Now, we are going to hear our first paper 6 00:00:22,760 --> 00:00:27,720 from Professor James VanderKam of the University of Notre Dame. 7 00:00:27,720 --> 00:00:32,680 And without any further ado, I will turn it over to him. 8 00:00:32,680 --> 00:00:34,320 Jim. 9 00:00:44,680 --> 00:00:46,440 OK. Good. 10 00:00:47,000 --> 00:00:48,400 JAMES: Alright. 11 00:00:48,400 --> 00:00:49,960 Thank you Larry. 12 00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:51,920 Good to see you again. 13 00:00:51,920 --> 00:00:55,360 Thanks to the sponsoring organizations 14 00:00:55,360 --> 00:00:58,400 and to organizers like yourself. 15 00:00:58,400 --> 00:01:01,760 And I want to say a special thanks to Kirsten Howe 16 00:01:01,760 --> 00:01:06,920 who has certainly answered all of my questions very well. 17 00:01:06,920 --> 00:01:12,320 Today, I want to talk about two texts that interest me quite a bit 18 00:01:12,320 --> 00:01:18,800 and I believe are very good illustrations of what might be done 19 00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:22,960 with Biblical events, texts, characters 20 00:01:22,960 --> 00:01:26,480 as these are passed along in the tradition. 21 00:01:26,480 --> 00:01:30,480 And in some ways, this will illustrate what (INAUDIBLE) 22 00:01:30,480 --> 00:01:33,120 were talking about a little earlier, 23 00:01:33,120 --> 00:01:38,600 the different kinds of ways in which very intelligent people 24 00:01:38,600 --> 00:01:42,680 read older texts like Genesis and Exodus, 25 00:01:42,680 --> 00:01:44,440 what messages they found in them 26 00:01:44,440 --> 00:01:48,800 and perhaps what messages they wanted to add to them. 27 00:01:48,800 --> 00:01:51,400 So there are two texts that we'll consider. 28 00:01:51,400 --> 00:01:55,640 The Book of Jubilees and the Visions of Amram, 29 00:01:55,640 --> 00:01:58,960 which is a text found among the Dead Sea Scrolls. 30 00:01:59,560 --> 00:02:04,720 First, a few basics about both of these texts. 31 00:02:04,720 --> 00:02:08,960 The Book of Jubilees is 32 00:02:09,440 --> 00:02:14,760 an example of what we usually call rewritten scripture. 33 00:02:14,760 --> 00:02:18,040 It has an introductory chapter which tells us 34 00:02:18,040 --> 00:02:23,800 that the book contains the revelations given by an angel of the presence 35 00:02:23,800 --> 00:02:27,160 to Moses while Moses is on Mount Sinai. 36 00:02:27,160 --> 00:02:31,680 And the angel of the presence is reading from heavenly tablets. 37 00:02:31,680 --> 00:02:35,640 So this book claims it is revelation from heaven 38 00:02:35,640 --> 00:02:39,120 given to Moses at Mount Sinai. 39 00:02:39,120 --> 00:02:43,240 The following chapters tell the stories of Genesis, 40 00:02:43,240 --> 00:02:47,520 all the way to the end of the book, and then on into the Book of Exodus 41 00:02:47,520 --> 00:02:51,000 until the Israelites are at Mount Sinai 42 00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:53,720 and the covenant is made there. 43 00:02:53,720 --> 00:02:55,360 So, 44 00:02:55,360 --> 00:02:58,880 it is an example of rewriting the older stories 45 00:02:58,880 --> 00:03:02,920 in the book of Genesis and the book of Exodus. 46 00:03:02,920 --> 00:03:05,800 The book was written in Hebrew and a number of the fragments 47 00:03:05,800 --> 00:03:10,080 of the fragmentary copies of the book of Jubilees 48 00:03:10,080 --> 00:03:13,240 have been found among the Dead Sea Scrolls. 49 00:03:13,240 --> 00:03:15,520 A total of 14 copies in all, 50 00:03:15,520 --> 00:03:19,400 which is a an unusually high number of copies. 51 00:03:19,960 --> 00:03:24,360 The other texts called the Vision or Visions of Amram 52 00:03:24,360 --> 00:03:28,560 is a text found at Qumran, a text that we didn't know about 53 00:03:28,560 --> 00:03:32,080 before the discovery of the fourth cave 54 00:03:32,080 --> 00:03:35,440 and the publication of those texts. 55 00:03:35,440 --> 00:03:39,240 There are seven copies of this work, it appears. 56 00:03:39,240 --> 00:03:43,960 They're numbered by the numbers given to the texts from cave four 57 00:03:43,960 --> 00:03:47,480 as 543 to 549. 58 00:03:47,480 --> 00:03:50,640 And using the different copies of this text, 59 00:03:50,640 --> 00:03:54,280 we can put together a pretty good sequence in it 60 00:03:54,280 --> 00:03:58,200 and get a pretty good idea of what the writer is saying. 61 00:03:58,200 --> 00:04:03,160 Now, the Visions of Amram was written in the Aramaic language 62 00:04:03,160 --> 00:04:07,280 and it contains a statement from this man Amram. 63 00:04:07,280 --> 00:04:12,080 He may not be the most familiar person to 64 00:04:12,080 --> 00:04:15,840 people in our audience but his name is mentioned in the Bible 65 00:04:15,840 --> 00:04:18,000 and his claim to fame for us 66 00:04:18,000 --> 00:04:23,160 is that he was the father of Moses and Aaron and Miriam. 67 00:04:23,720 --> 00:04:27,480 His name is listed in genealogies in the Bible. 68 00:04:27,480 --> 00:04:30,280 But when we read the stories about Moses' birth, 69 00:04:30,280 --> 00:04:32,880 his father is just called his father, 70 00:04:32,880 --> 00:04:36,280 he's not given the name, Amram, there. 71 00:04:36,280 --> 00:04:39,960 In this text, Amram, Moses' father, 72 00:04:39,960 --> 00:04:42,640 is calling his children together 73 00:04:42,640 --> 00:04:46,600 as he's about to die to die at the age of 136. 74 00:04:46,600 --> 00:04:51,280 and in the text, he gives wise words to his children. 75 00:04:51,280 --> 00:04:57,400 So Jubilees and the Visions of Amram are rather different kinds of texts 76 00:04:57,400 --> 00:05:02,280 but in one small respect, they overlap with each other 77 00:05:02,280 --> 00:05:05,960 and give us illustrations of how people, 78 00:05:05,960 --> 00:05:09,680 very early writers like this, were dealing with some issues 79 00:05:09,680 --> 00:05:13,160 in the last chapter or so of Genesis 80 00:05:13,160 --> 00:05:17,400 and the first chapter of the book of Exodus. 81 00:05:18,080 --> 00:05:20,800 Now, about the Visions of Amram, 82 00:05:20,800 --> 00:05:23,400 and in fact, that's what the text calls itself. 83 00:05:23,400 --> 00:05:27,640 So it's one of those scrolls that gives itself a name. 84 00:05:28,640 --> 00:05:32,920 We can tell from several of the copies, how the text began, 85 00:05:32,920 --> 00:05:36,480 and putting these fragmentary copies together, 86 00:05:36,480 --> 00:05:38,440 the beginning of the text reads like this. 87 00:05:38,440 --> 00:05:42,840 I haven't prepared a slide of this, so I'll just read it to you. 88 00:05:42,840 --> 00:05:46,320 It begins "A copy of the book. 89 00:05:46,320 --> 00:05:51,880 The words of the visions of Amram, son of Kohath, son of Levi. 90 00:05:52,560 --> 00:05:56,480 It contains everything that he told his sons 91 00:05:56,480 --> 00:05:59,120 and everything that he commanded them 92 00:05:59,120 --> 00:06:00,880 on the day that he died 93 00:06:01,360 --> 00:06:04,200 in the 136th year, 94 00:06:04,200 --> 00:06:06,280 that is the year of his death, 95 00:06:06,280 --> 00:06:12,520 in the 152nd year of Israel's sojourn in Egypt". 96 00:06:12,520 --> 00:06:14,640 And at that point, the text tells us 97 00:06:14,640 --> 00:06:17,880 "he gave his 30 year old daughter Miriam 98 00:06:17,880 --> 00:06:20,520 to his younger brother Uzziel". 99 00:06:20,520 --> 00:06:23,520 Another name that's mentioned in the Bible, 100 00:06:23,520 --> 00:06:26,640 who is a son of Kohath just as Amram is. 101 00:06:26,640 --> 00:06:27,760 So he gives his daughter Miriam 102 00:06:27,760 --> 00:06:31,880 in marriage to his brother Uzziel. 103 00:06:31,880 --> 00:06:34,640 A niece marriage in this case. 104 00:06:35,360 --> 00:06:39,800 Amram hosted a seven day banquet, after which he summoned his son Aaron 105 00:06:39,800 --> 00:06:43,800 who was supposed to be about 20 years of age at the time. 106 00:06:43,800 --> 00:06:46,240 And Aaron is to call the other children 107 00:06:46,240 --> 00:06:48,680 for the testamentary address 108 00:06:48,680 --> 00:06:52,040 that Amram is going to give them. 109 00:06:52,040 --> 00:06:55,720 So those are some basic things about these two works. 110 00:06:55,720 --> 00:06:57,960 Now, even though they are so different, 111 00:06:57,960 --> 00:07:03,520 they overlap in one section that I would like to turn to now. 112 00:07:05,480 --> 00:07:08,360 If we look at these texts in their entirety, 113 00:07:08,360 --> 00:07:11,440 we might be surprised that they overlap in anything 114 00:07:11,440 --> 00:07:14,360 but in... as a matter of fact they do. 115 00:07:14,360 --> 00:07:17,480 The one section where they give a similar material, 116 00:07:17,480 --> 00:07:20,240 or related material, is the story about 117 00:07:20,240 --> 00:07:25,960 the effort to bury the bones of Joseph's brother in Canaan 118 00:07:25,960 --> 00:07:29,800 and some obstacles that impeded the effort. 119 00:07:30,360 --> 00:07:33,720 These two texts - Jubilees and the Visions of Amram - 120 00:07:33,720 --> 00:07:36,520 provide the earliest literary records 121 00:07:36,520 --> 00:07:39,960 of a story or perhaps stories 122 00:07:39,960 --> 00:07:45,520 about warfare between the king of Canaan and the king of Egypt 123 00:07:45,520 --> 00:07:52,000 and how that conflict impacted travel between the two countries 124 00:07:52,000 --> 00:07:54,120 and thus, affected the project 125 00:07:54,120 --> 00:07:59,160 to bury the bones of Joseph's 11 brothers. 126 00:07:59,760 --> 00:08:02,440 So let's turn to the account in Jubilees first, 127 00:08:02,440 --> 00:08:04,680 and if we could have that slide 128 00:08:04,680 --> 00:08:06,800 so we can have the translation in front of us, 129 00:08:06,800 --> 00:08:09,840 that would be good at this time. 130 00:08:10,440 --> 00:08:13,920 There we have the account in the book of Jubilees. 131 00:08:13,920 --> 00:08:16,760 You can see it's from chapter 46 132 00:08:16,760 --> 00:08:19,080 and the beginning of chapter 47. 133 00:08:19,080 --> 00:08:20,960 Now remember, an angel of the presence 134 00:08:20,960 --> 00:08:24,480 is dictating all of this stuff to Moses. 135 00:08:24,480 --> 00:08:27,560 It's an unusual section because at this point, 136 00:08:27,560 --> 00:08:30,480 the angel of the presence gets up to Moses' life. 137 00:08:30,480 --> 00:08:33,240 So he starts talking... 138 00:08:33,240 --> 00:08:37,080 telling Moses what happened in his - Moses' - own life. 139 00:08:37,080 --> 00:08:41,320 Now this is from my translation of the Book of Jubilees. 140 00:08:41,320 --> 00:08:44,200 So before Joseph died, he ordered the Israelites 141 00:08:44,200 --> 00:08:45,640 to take his bones along 142 00:08:45,640 --> 00:08:48,400 at the time when they would leave the land of Egypt. 143 00:08:48,400 --> 00:08:51,000 He made them swear about his bones because he knew 144 00:08:51,000 --> 00:08:54,600 the Egyptians would surely not allow him to be brought out 145 00:08:54,600 --> 00:08:58,160 and be buried in the land of Canaan on the day of his death 146 00:08:58,160 --> 00:09:00,200 since Makamaron, the king of Canaan, 147 00:09:00,200 --> 00:09:02,560 while he was living in the land of Assur, 148 00:09:02,560 --> 00:09:04,680 fought in the valley with the king of Egypt 149 00:09:04,680 --> 00:09:06,760 and killed him there. 150 00:09:06,760 --> 00:09:10,240 He pursued the Egyptians as far as the borders of Egypt. 151 00:09:10,240 --> 00:09:14,560 He was unable to enter because another new king ruled Egypt. 152 00:09:14,560 --> 00:09:18,120 He was stronger than he, so he returned to the land of Canaan 153 00:09:18,120 --> 00:09:20,080 Kanan and the gates of Egypt were closed 154 00:09:20,080 --> 00:09:24,800 with no one leaving or entering Egypt. 155 00:09:24,800 --> 00:09:28,160 Joseph died in the 46th Jubilee in the sixth week 156 00:09:28,160 --> 00:09:30,200 during its second year. 157 00:09:30,200 --> 00:09:34,680 In brackets there, you see what the year of the world is 158 00:09:34,680 --> 00:09:38,880 that Jubilees expresses in that unusual way. 159 00:09:38,880 --> 00:09:42,640 He was buried in the land of Egypt and all his brothers died after him. 160 00:09:42,640 --> 00:09:45,920 Then the king of Egypt went out to fight with the king of Canaan 161 00:09:45,920 --> 00:09:49,960 in the 47th Jubilee in the second week 162 00:09:49,960 --> 00:09:52,680 during its second year. The Israelites brought out 163 00:09:52,680 --> 00:09:56,880 all the bones of Jacob's sons except Joseph's bones. 164 00:09:56,880 --> 00:09:59,240 They buried them in the field of the double cave, 165 00:09:59,240 --> 00:10:03,240 that is Machpelah in the mountain. 166 00:10:03,720 --> 00:10:10,280 Many returned to Egypt but a few of them remained on the mountain. 167 00:10:15,160 --> 00:10:19,040 Few of them remained on the mountain of Hebron 168 00:10:19,040 --> 00:10:22,680 and Moses father, Amram, remained with them. 169 00:10:22,680 --> 00:10:25,440 Then the king of Canaan conquered the king of Egypt, 170 00:10:25,440 --> 00:10:27,560 closed the gates of Egypt, 171 00:10:27,560 --> 00:10:29,720 conceived an evil plan against the Israelites, 172 00:10:29,720 --> 00:10:32,480 and then we read about the oppression, 173 00:10:32,480 --> 00:10:36,400 including the words about expressing the king's concern 174 00:10:36,400 --> 00:10:41,560 that the many many Israelites might fight against the Egyptians. 175 00:10:41,560 --> 00:10:43,800 And then we get to the birth of Moses 176 00:10:43,800 --> 00:10:47,640 after his father returns from Canaan to Egypt. 177 00:10:47,640 --> 00:10:52,160 Moses' birth in the year 2330 of the world. 178 00:10:52,160 --> 00:10:54,680 Now, a few comments on that version. 179 00:10:54,680 --> 00:10:58,120 It relates fairly closely to the end of the Book of Genesis. 180 00:10:58,120 --> 00:11:01,920 And if you're familiar with that part of the Book of Genesis, 181 00:11:01,920 --> 00:11:03,360 you start reading and you think 182 00:11:03,360 --> 00:11:06,360 'Oh yes, I know this story at the end of Genesis' 183 00:11:06,360 --> 00:11:08,960 but all of a sudden, it takes a turn 184 00:11:08,960 --> 00:11:10,760 and you get some unfamiliar material. 185 00:11:10,760 --> 00:11:14,320 You meet a king, Makamaron, the king of Canaan 186 00:11:14,320 --> 00:11:17,840 who conquered the king of Egypt and so on. 187 00:11:17,840 --> 00:11:19,640 Now at the beginning of the story, of course, 188 00:11:19,640 --> 00:11:22,600 Joseph is the key actor in the drama 189 00:11:22,600 --> 00:11:26,400 and the writer refers to Joseph's instructions to... 190 00:11:26,400 --> 00:11:29,160 First, he gives them to his brothers, and then the text says, 191 00:11:29,160 --> 00:11:31,320 he gives them to the Israelites 192 00:11:31,320 --> 00:11:35,920 to bring up his bones when the Israelites leave Egypt, 193 00:11:35,920 --> 00:11:39,880 they'll leave when the Lord visits them. 194 00:11:39,880 --> 00:11:42,920 Whatever that might have been. 195 00:11:42,920 --> 00:11:46,760 But he speaks very emphatically about this. 196 00:11:47,320 --> 00:11:50,120 And later on in the book of Exodus, 197 00:11:50,120 --> 00:11:53,800 there's reference to Moses taking the bones of Joseph 198 00:11:53,800 --> 00:11:59,000 when they left Egypt and the burial is talked about in Joshua 24. 199 00:11:59,000 --> 00:12:01,160 Now, these statements of Joseph's 200 00:12:01,160 --> 00:12:03,880 making his brothers or the Israelites 201 00:12:03,880 --> 00:12:06,240 swear that they'll bring his bones out of Egypt 202 00:12:06,240 --> 00:12:08,960 suggests that there was something unusual about his case. 203 00:12:08,960 --> 00:12:12,640 He does not mention the bones of his brothers 204 00:12:12,640 --> 00:12:14,600 or any need to bring their bones up 205 00:12:14,600 --> 00:12:17,480 at the time of the divine visitation. 206 00:12:17,480 --> 00:12:20,440 So the reader senses that Joseph's remains 207 00:12:20,440 --> 00:12:23,440 will be treated differently, as indeed they were, 208 00:12:23,440 --> 00:12:24,800 but does not know why, 209 00:12:24,800 --> 00:12:27,280 and Jubilees explains why that was, 210 00:12:27,280 --> 00:12:30,720 it was because of this war with the king of Canaan 211 00:12:30,720 --> 00:12:34,240 that meant that the borders between the two areas were closed 212 00:12:34,240 --> 00:12:37,400 so one couldn't go out from Egypt to bury Joseph 213 00:12:37,400 --> 00:12:41,800 as they had buried his father Jacob. 214 00:12:41,800 --> 00:12:47,960 Now, we also read, both in the Bible and Jubilees, 215 00:12:47,960 --> 00:12:50,680 about Joseph's burial in the land of Egypt 216 00:12:50,680 --> 00:12:53,640 before his brothers die. 217 00:12:53,640 --> 00:12:56,400 Well, the victory of the king of Canaan over Egypt 218 00:12:56,400 --> 00:12:59,240 and the closing of Egypt's borders 219 00:12:59,240 --> 00:13:02,560 explains why Joseph couldn't be buried in Canaan 220 00:13:02,560 --> 00:13:05,880 right away on the day of his death. 221 00:13:06,400 --> 00:13:08,800 He already knew this beforehand apparently, 222 00:13:08,800 --> 00:13:11,200 almost in a prophetic way, 223 00:13:11,200 --> 00:13:14,840 so he gave instructions about handling his bones. 224 00:13:15,400 --> 00:13:19,480 Now, the brothers deaths after Joseph, 225 00:13:19,480 --> 00:13:22,720 this is suggested by a couple of verses in the Bible 226 00:13:22,720 --> 00:13:25,640 that they died after Joseph. 227 00:13:25,640 --> 00:13:28,440 Their bones were handled when the king of Egypt, 228 00:13:28,440 --> 00:13:30,280 the new king of Egypt, 229 00:13:30,280 --> 00:13:32,800 made a counteroffensive against the king of Canaan 230 00:13:32,800 --> 00:13:35,680 that opened the borders of Egypt. 231 00:13:35,680 --> 00:13:38,440 So they took advantage of this time, 232 00:13:38,440 --> 00:13:42,440 went up and buried the 11 brothers but not Joseph, 233 00:13:42,440 --> 00:13:45,800 who was already buried in Egypt. 234 00:13:45,800 --> 00:13:50,760 So they went to the family burial ground, the cave on Machpelah. 235 00:13:50,760 --> 00:13:52,640 Well, when the king of Canaan reconquered Egypt 236 00:13:52,640 --> 00:13:55,120 and, again, forced closure of the borders, 237 00:13:55,120 --> 00:13:58,160 the oppression began in Egypt. 238 00:13:58,160 --> 00:14:01,360 And of course, there was the fear 239 00:14:01,360 --> 00:14:05,480 that the Israelites would fight against the enemies of Egypt, 240 00:14:05,480 --> 00:14:08,200 which seemed to be Canaan at this time, 241 00:14:08,200 --> 00:14:11,880 and so the Egyptians oppressed them. 242 00:14:12,720 --> 00:14:18,840 Eventually, Amran returns to Egypt after a 40 year absence 243 00:14:18,840 --> 00:14:20,560 and Moses is born. 244 00:14:20,560 --> 00:14:22,600 Now, could we see the other slide 245 00:14:22,600 --> 00:14:26,360 which has the translation of the Visions of Amram? 246 00:14:26,360 --> 00:14:30,360 This is a translation of Ed Cook Dead Sea Scrolls reader 247 00:14:30,360 --> 00:14:32,880 that I've modified slightly. 248 00:14:32,880 --> 00:14:36,520 And this is a composite text 249 00:14:36,520 --> 00:14:40,760 based on several of the manuscripts of the Visions of Amram. 250 00:14:40,760 --> 00:14:44,480 It's a typical Qumran text in that you have a lot of gaps 251 00:14:44,480 --> 00:14:47,600 that we don't know what was present there. 252 00:14:47,600 --> 00:14:51,200 But there is reference, and remember, Amram is talking, 253 00:14:51,200 --> 00:14:55,880 he's In the land of Canaan, he went to bury our fathers. 254 00:14:55,880 --> 00:15:00,760 These appear to be the 11 brothers of Joseph. 255 00:15:00,760 --> 00:15:04,120 And he mentions that his father, Kohath or Kohath, 256 00:15:04,120 --> 00:15:06,840 was also along there. 257 00:15:06,840 --> 00:15:10,320 And they talk about building the tombs of the fathers, 258 00:15:10,320 --> 00:15:13,360 so it doesn't seem as if it's just a burial in a cave, 259 00:15:13,360 --> 00:15:16,240 they're actually building tombs. 260 00:15:16,240 --> 00:15:19,440 While others of the relatives are there. 261 00:15:19,440 --> 00:15:25,840 A large body of people are burying the 11 brothers of Joseph. 262 00:15:25,840 --> 00:15:28,160 But then they hear about a war, it says, 263 00:15:28,160 --> 00:15:31,120 a frightening rumor of war. 264 00:15:31,120 --> 00:15:35,160 And our group, he says, returned to the land of Egypt. 265 00:15:35,160 --> 00:15:38,280 And then Amram says that... 266 00:15:38,280 --> 00:15:41,120 I don't know if he went back to Egypt and then back to Canaan again 267 00:15:41,120 --> 00:15:43,920 or just stayed in Canaan, but at any rate, 268 00:15:43,920 --> 00:15:48,880 he remained in Canaan to bury the bones of Joseph's brothers. 269 00:15:49,360 --> 00:15:50,840 And war broke out. 270 00:15:50,840 --> 00:15:53,920 He mentions that he has both (INAUDIBLE) and Canaan 271 00:15:53,920 --> 00:15:59,600 fighting against Egypt, and they close the borders again. 272 00:15:59,600 --> 00:16:02,680 This... the text mentions apparently, 273 00:16:02,680 --> 00:16:04,400 although it's quite broken here, 274 00:16:04,400 --> 00:16:10,520 that Amram was separated from his wife, Jochebed, for 41 years, 275 00:16:10,520 --> 00:16:13,280 and only after that, was he able to return. 276 00:16:13,280 --> 00:16:18,720 And then the text continues with a vision that Amram talks about. 277 00:16:18,720 --> 00:16:22,880 So both of these texts - Jubilees and the Visions of Amram - 278 00:16:22,880 --> 00:16:26,600 talk about a war between Canaan and Egypt, 279 00:16:26,600 --> 00:16:31,240 how the border gets closed, how this affects the burial process 280 00:16:31,240 --> 00:16:34,280 of burying the 11 brothers. 281 00:16:35,440 --> 00:16:39,600 We don't know the immediate preceding context for the Visions of Amram 282 00:16:39,600 --> 00:16:42,160 because of damage to the texts 283 00:16:42,160 --> 00:16:45,520 but we can tell that it's not as closely tied 284 00:16:45,520 --> 00:16:48,720 to the text of Genesis and Exodus as Jubilees is, 285 00:16:48,720 --> 00:16:51,480 and it, of course, focuses on Amram. 286 00:16:51,480 --> 00:16:54,280 After all, this texts is named after him. 287 00:16:54,280 --> 00:16:59,240 And it's the account of his report to his children on his deathbed. 288 00:17:00,280 --> 00:17:04,120 This is one of several texts we have from the Dead Sea Scrolls, 289 00:17:04,120 --> 00:17:09,000 Aramaic texts about these early priests, 290 00:17:09,000 --> 00:17:12,880 Levi, his son Kohath and his son Amram. 291 00:17:12,880 --> 00:17:15,680 We have texts about all of them in Aramaic 292 00:17:15,680 --> 00:17:21,640 expanding what little is said about them in the Bible. 293 00:17:22,400 --> 00:17:26,440 Perhaps the reason being that it was felt 294 00:17:26,440 --> 00:17:30,600 these characters really should have more of a resume 295 00:17:30,600 --> 00:17:35,520 to justify their occupying such an important position 296 00:17:35,520 --> 00:17:38,840 in the genealogy of priests. 297 00:17:38,840 --> 00:17:41,840 Very briefly, you can see that the burial of Joseph's brothers 298 00:17:41,840 --> 00:17:45,280 is a major element in the plot. 299 00:17:45,280 --> 00:17:48,920 Much more time is spent in this text with that 300 00:17:48,920 --> 00:17:53,720 than in Jubilees, which mentions it just in one line. 301 00:17:54,360 --> 00:17:59,160 It's quite a project because the tombs have to be built. 302 00:17:59,160 --> 00:18:02,360 Another element that's important in the Amram text 303 00:18:02,360 --> 00:18:07,520 is that Amram is separated from his wife. 304 00:18:07,520 --> 00:18:10,440 It may be that the text says 305 00:18:10,440 --> 00:18:14,960 he did not take another wife during these 41 years, 306 00:18:14,960 --> 00:18:17,480 although apparently others were available, 307 00:18:17,480 --> 00:18:21,360 and he's eager to get back home to see his wife. 308 00:18:21,360 --> 00:18:25,160 But the two of them are separated for many many years. 309 00:18:25,160 --> 00:18:28,280 Now, what I want to consider very briefly 310 00:18:28,280 --> 00:18:31,120 is the relation between these two accounts. 311 00:18:31,120 --> 00:18:32,400 Did one... 312 00:18:32,400 --> 00:18:34,520 Did, say, Jubilees borrow it from the testament 313 00:18:34,520 --> 00:18:38,560 or the Visions of Amram 314 00:18:38,560 --> 00:18:40,320 or was that the other way around 315 00:18:40,320 --> 00:18:46,440 or did both of them borrow it from some other source? 316 00:18:48,880 --> 00:18:53,080 Jubilee is... I think everybody agrees, 317 00:18:53,080 --> 00:18:54,920 was written in the 2nd century BCE, 318 00:18:54,920 --> 00:18:57,360 exactly when during the century, people debate. 319 00:18:57,360 --> 00:19:00,480 I think maybe toward the middle of the century. 320 00:19:00,480 --> 00:19:03,720 It may be that the Visions of Amram is an older text. 321 00:19:03,720 --> 00:19:07,760 The editor of the text, Emile Puech, certainly thought it was older 322 00:19:07,760 --> 00:19:12,760 and that perhaps Jubilees used the Visions of Amram. 323 00:19:12,760 --> 00:19:15,120 I think though that that's very unlikely, 324 00:19:15,120 --> 00:19:17,320 the texts are similar in some ways. 325 00:19:17,320 --> 00:19:22,160 They both refer to a war between Canaan and Egypt 326 00:19:22,160 --> 00:19:23,760 and both present the war 327 00:19:23,760 --> 00:19:27,840 as the context for burying the bones of Joseph's brothers. 328 00:19:29,600 --> 00:19:32,360 And both mention Amram's return to Egypt 329 00:19:32,360 --> 00:19:36,080 after apparently about the same amount of time, 40 or 41 years 330 00:19:36,080 --> 00:19:41,440 that he was separated from his wife in Canaan 331 00:19:41,440 --> 00:19:45,960 before he could go back to the land of Egypt. 332 00:19:45,960 --> 00:19:48,400 So the emphases are certainly different 333 00:19:48,400 --> 00:19:50,840 and it seems as though the Visions of Amram 334 00:19:50,840 --> 00:19:53,480 pick up only a part of the war account 335 00:19:53,480 --> 00:19:56,760 whereas Jubilees has a more expanded form of the war account, 336 00:19:56,760 --> 00:19:58,880 having three phases in it, 337 00:19:58,880 --> 00:20:02,040 and Jubilees includes the Joseph story, 338 00:20:02,040 --> 00:20:06,280 the last days of Joseph in its account. 339 00:20:06,280 --> 00:20:08,560 Now, we could... 340 00:20:08,560 --> 00:20:11,520 I think it's likely that both of them do this story 341 00:20:11,520 --> 00:20:14,520 from some other source or sources 342 00:20:14,520 --> 00:20:18,880 and we could just briefly ask what that source might have been. 343 00:20:18,880 --> 00:20:20,840 I think that one could put together 344 00:20:20,840 --> 00:20:25,520 from some hints in the books of Genesis and Exodus 345 00:20:25,520 --> 00:20:29,360 that there was a war or a threat of war 346 00:20:29,360 --> 00:20:32,920 at the time around Moses' birth 347 00:20:32,920 --> 00:20:35,960 and the time of the oppression in Egypt. 348 00:20:35,960 --> 00:20:38,880 Perhaps already at the end of Genesis, 349 00:20:38,880 --> 00:20:42,880 there was hostility between Egypt and Canaan. 350 00:20:42,880 --> 00:20:46,920 And there are many hints to this effect in the text, 351 00:20:46,920 --> 00:20:49,520 and I've already mentioned the fact that the new king of Egypt 352 00:20:49,520 --> 00:20:54,360 was concerned about the Israelites becoming so numerous and mighty 353 00:20:54,360 --> 00:20:57,720 that they were mightier than the Egyptians in case of war. 354 00:20:57,720 --> 00:21:02,200 They might join their enemies, the Canaanites apparently 355 00:21:02,200 --> 00:21:06,680 and fight against Egypt and leave the land. 356 00:21:06,680 --> 00:21:10,840 The Israelites are put to work on (UNKNOWN) 357 00:21:10,840 --> 00:21:13,520 it says in Exodus. 358 00:21:13,520 --> 00:21:17,160 One of the understandings of this term (UNKNOWN) 359 00:21:17,160 --> 00:21:19,960 was that these were fortified cities. 360 00:21:19,960 --> 00:21:23,160 We find this understanding of the term 361 00:21:23,160 --> 00:21:25,880 in the Septuagint and a couple of the Targums. 362 00:21:25,880 --> 00:21:30,000 It's certainly what we have in the book of Jubilees. 363 00:21:30,000 --> 00:21:32,680 I suspect then that the two do it from a common source. 364 00:21:32,680 --> 00:21:36,640 I think maybe someone do to gather the clues 365 00:21:36,640 --> 00:21:39,040 that we have in Genesis and Exodus 366 00:21:39,040 --> 00:21:43,640 about possible conflict at the end of Joseph's life 367 00:21:43,640 --> 00:21:46,360 and the burial of the brothers and so on. 368 00:21:46,360 --> 00:21:49,960 Conflict between Egypt and Canaan. 369 00:21:50,840 --> 00:21:54,200 I wonder if a story like this was perhaps in something 370 00:21:54,200 --> 00:21:58,760 like the texts that we call either reworked Pentateuch or Pentateuch, 371 00:21:58,760 --> 00:22:03,240 whatever they were. These somewhat expanded stories 372 00:22:03,240 --> 00:22:05,800 or accounts of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, 373 00:22:05,800 --> 00:22:08,040 Numbers and Deuteronomy. 374 00:22:08,040 --> 00:22:12,040 Maybe something like this entered into such a text 375 00:22:12,040 --> 00:22:16,760 and this is the way in which our two authors ran into it 376 00:22:16,760 --> 00:22:19,560 and both developed it for their own purposes. 377 00:22:20,360 --> 00:22:22,520 OK, I'll stop there. Thank you. 378 00:22:22,520 --> 00:22:25,280 LAWRENCE: OK. Thank you very much for this wonderful presentation. 379 00:22:25,280 --> 00:22:30,920 And we go to our wonderful question moderator, Pat. 380 00:22:30,920 --> 00:22:32,880 PATRICK: Thank you, Professor VanderKamp. 381 00:22:32,880 --> 00:22:37,120 So, can we have a couple of questions lined up so far. 382 00:22:37,120 --> 00:22:40,520 First being from Dr Elizabeth (UNKNOWN) who asks, 383 00:22:40,520 --> 00:22:44,760 if you have any thoughts on the language difference 384 00:22:44,760 --> 00:22:47,560 between the Visions of Amram being in Aramaic 385 00:22:47,560 --> 00:22:50,560 and Jubilees being in Hebrew. 386 00:22:52,320 --> 00:22:54,200 JAMES: I don't have many thoughts about it. 387 00:22:54,200 --> 00:22:57,840 I know it's sometimes argued in our field that 388 00:22:57,840 --> 00:23:02,240 the Aramaic texts at Qumran are generally earlier 389 00:23:02,240 --> 00:23:03,560 than the Hebrew ones, 390 00:23:03,560 --> 00:23:06,040 whether that's the case all the time, 391 00:23:06,040 --> 00:23:09,800 I really don't know because I haven't investigated it. 392 00:23:11,560 --> 00:23:14,840 It is interesting that Jubilee is it sticks much more closely 393 00:23:14,840 --> 00:23:17,840 to the texts of Genesis and Exodus 394 00:23:17,840 --> 00:23:21,760 and explains certain problems that arise in the text 395 00:23:21,760 --> 00:23:24,520 or fills in certain gaps in the text. 396 00:23:24,520 --> 00:23:31,280 Whereas the Aramaic text is of more of a free composition, 397 00:23:31,280 --> 00:23:33,960 a free creation, I think. 398 00:23:33,960 --> 00:23:38,600 Perhaps writing in Aramaic allowed that 399 00:23:38,600 --> 00:23:42,040 or facilitated that more so than writing in Hebrew, 400 00:23:42,040 --> 00:23:45,600 but we, of course, have some Hebrew texts 401 00:23:45,600 --> 00:23:47,600 that are also 402 00:23:48,120 --> 00:23:53,400 more freely with material and scriptural books. 403 00:23:54,360 --> 00:23:56,800 PATRICK: Great. Thank you. 404 00:23:56,800 --> 00:24:00,360 So another question lined up here asks 405 00:24:00,360 --> 00:24:04,080 if you have any thoughts on whether the Visions of Amram 406 00:24:04,080 --> 00:24:07,840 should be considered as a sectarian document, 407 00:24:07,840 --> 00:24:11,560 closely associated, for example, with (UNKNOWN) 408 00:24:11,560 --> 00:24:16,240 or just how any sort of sectarian interpretation 409 00:24:16,240 --> 00:24:18,840 might be involved in any of these expansions 410 00:24:18,840 --> 00:24:23,480 or reworkings of the biblical text. 411 00:24:23,480 --> 00:24:25,800 JAMES: I don't... 412 00:24:25,800 --> 00:24:29,640 I'm not aware of any very strongly sectarian aspects 413 00:24:29,640 --> 00:24:32,800 of the Visions of Amram. 414 00:24:32,800 --> 00:24:37,800 It is a text that partakes of a concern we find 415 00:24:37,800 --> 00:24:40,080 in other texts from Qumran also 416 00:24:40,080 --> 00:24:42,560 that I think are not obviously sectarian 417 00:24:42,560 --> 00:24:46,200 like the Aramaic Levi document 418 00:24:46,200 --> 00:24:49,560 and the testament of Kohath. 419 00:24:50,400 --> 00:24:53,880 These are texts that, as I said earlier, 420 00:24:53,880 --> 00:24:58,240 give a better resume to these ancient priests than we... 421 00:24:58,760 --> 00:25:03,480 otherwise have only names for them given in the Bible. 422 00:25:03,480 --> 00:25:07,280 But I don't see these as sectarian texts. 423 00:25:08,360 --> 00:25:10,560 I don't... 424 00:25:10,560 --> 00:25:14,120 It's not obvious to me at least that they are, 425 00:25:14,120 --> 00:25:18,400 let's say, texts attacking the current priesthood, 426 00:25:18,400 --> 00:25:22,480 the priesthood in Jerusalem in a sectarian fashion 427 00:25:22,480 --> 00:25:26,840 like we find some other attacks in the Dead Sea Scrolls. 428 00:25:26,840 --> 00:25:32,160 I presume these texts were written before this particular 429 00:25:32,160 --> 00:25:34,720 group of (INAUDIBLE) was formed, 430 00:25:34,720 --> 00:25:39,200 and therefore, we wouldn't expect to find sectarian features 431 00:25:39,200 --> 00:25:42,080 in them anyway. 432 00:25:43,800 --> 00:25:46,360 PATRICK: Great. Thank you. 433 00:25:47,160 --> 00:25:48,800 Let's see. 434 00:25:48,800 --> 00:25:51,720 Yeah. I mean a follow-up question to that, I guess, 435 00:25:51,720 --> 00:25:55,560 is one posed here about just how widely then 436 00:25:55,560 --> 00:25:58,160 might these texts be representative of, 437 00:25:58,160 --> 00:26:00,440 kind of, currents and thoughts, traditions 438 00:26:00,440 --> 00:26:04,880 in the second temple period. 439 00:26:05,760 --> 00:26:09,280 JAMES: I think that both of them show, 440 00:26:09,280 --> 00:26:12,880 in addition to 441 00:26:12,880 --> 00:26:15,520 the desire to expand on 442 00:26:15,520 --> 00:26:19,600 what the end of Genesis and the beginning of Exodus offer us. 443 00:26:19,600 --> 00:26:21,760 I think both of them show some evidence 444 00:26:21,760 --> 00:26:24,400 of concern with chronological problems 445 00:26:24,400 --> 00:26:27,160 that arise in the scriptural text. 446 00:26:27,680 --> 00:26:31,200 One of the chief problems in chronology 447 00:26:31,200 --> 00:26:33,920 that we find treated in several sources, 448 00:26:33,920 --> 00:26:36,320 both in the scrolls and outside, 449 00:26:36,320 --> 00:26:40,240 is the time after the descent into Egypt, 450 00:26:40,240 --> 00:26:44,520 after Joseph's or Jacob's descent into Egypt. 451 00:26:44,520 --> 00:26:46,360 He lives another 17 years there 452 00:26:46,360 --> 00:26:50,120 and we read about the end of Joseph's life. 453 00:26:50,120 --> 00:26:54,400 And we also have a genealogy in Exodus 6 454 00:26:54,400 --> 00:26:57,080 of the early priests, 455 00:26:57,080 --> 00:27:00,440 the descendants of Levi for several generations 456 00:27:00,440 --> 00:27:05,400 where we run into Kohath and Amram and Aaron. 457 00:27:05,400 --> 00:27:09,000 And that particular genealogy 458 00:27:09,000 --> 00:27:12,920 does not give us the kind of chronological information 459 00:27:12,920 --> 00:27:16,320 that we would get, say, in Genesis 5 or 11 460 00:27:16,320 --> 00:27:18,600 where we find out how old the father was 461 00:27:18,600 --> 00:27:21,360 when his first son was born. 462 00:27:21,360 --> 00:27:23,880 But all of this fed into the larger problem 463 00:27:23,880 --> 00:27:27,040 of when did the Israelites leave from Egypt. 464 00:27:27,040 --> 00:27:30,480 How do you explain the number in Exodus 12:40, 465 00:27:30,480 --> 00:27:33,000 about the 430 years, 466 00:27:33,000 --> 00:27:37,200 or the one in Genesis 15 about 400 years. 467 00:27:37,200 --> 00:27:40,360 So they play into a larger chronological issue 468 00:27:40,360 --> 00:27:43,640 and offer their own solutions to it. 469 00:27:45,480 --> 00:27:47,960 PATRICK: Do we have time for one more? 470 00:27:47,960 --> 00:27:49,440 LAWRENCE: I think we can take one more question 471 00:27:49,440 --> 00:27:51,120 because this is the last session of the day, 472 00:27:51,120 --> 00:27:55,280 if we end up ending five minutes late, not gonna hurt anyone, I think. 473 00:27:55,880 --> 00:27:59,120 PATRICK: Sure. So we have a question from Jonatan Miller. 474 00:27:59,120 --> 00:28:00,120 So I'll just... 475 00:28:00,120 --> 00:28:02,400 It's a little... 476 00:28:02,400 --> 00:28:05,480 It sets up well, so I'll just read the whole thing. 477 00:28:06,360 --> 00:28:10,720 Could these texts be trying to make sense of I Chronicles 7, 478 00:28:10,720 --> 00:28:14,200 especially verse 24, which insinuates 479 00:28:14,200 --> 00:28:18,120 that the sons of Ephraim never left the land of Canaan. 480 00:28:18,120 --> 00:28:24,200 Perhaps they were stuck on account of the border closure. 481 00:28:25,080 --> 00:28:30,400 JAMES: I don't see any obvious connection to that particular issue. 482 00:28:31,000 --> 00:28:34,320 We find a focus here on 483 00:28:34,320 --> 00:28:38,120 at least in the Amram text, on the part that 484 00:28:38,120 --> 00:28:41,840 Amram and his family, his father and so on, 485 00:28:41,840 --> 00:28:43,920 played in this burial process. 486 00:28:43,920 --> 00:28:46,400 And I really don't see any 487 00:28:46,400 --> 00:28:51,680 explicit indication that the Ephraim issue was involved. 488 00:28:51,680 --> 00:28:56,600 LAWRENCE: OK. Thank you very much Jim for this wonderful presentation. 489 00:28:56,600 --> 00:28:59,720 And I think the audience (INAUDIBLE) 490 00:29:00,400 --> 00:29:03,800 figure out that most of the people speaking are all friends, 491 00:29:03,800 --> 00:29:06,960 and we all hope to be seeing each other soon in person 492 00:29:06,960 --> 00:29:08,920 and arguing out some of these issues. 493 00:29:08,920 --> 00:29:11,520 So our next speaker, Ariel Feldman, 494 00:29:11,520 --> 00:29:14,880 from Brite Divinity School will be speaking on 495 00:29:14,880 --> 00:29:17,720 'Deciphering fragments, tefillin - 496 00:29:17,720 --> 00:29:21,200 which are phylacteries - or an amulet'. OK? 497 00:29:21,200 --> 00:29:23,080 Professor Feldman. 498 00:29:23,080 --> 00:29:25,000 ARIEL: Well, let me begin with a word of thanks 499 00:29:25,000 --> 00:29:27,760 to Professor Schiffman for this generous invitation 500 00:29:27,760 --> 00:29:30,400 to be a part of this wonderful conference. 501 00:29:30,400 --> 00:29:33,000 I am also very grateful to Professor Justin 502 00:29:33,000 --> 00:29:37,960 and all others at NYU and beyond who made this event possible. 503 00:29:38,880 --> 00:29:41,280 My presentation today is a result of 504 00:29:41,280 --> 00:29:44,560 a sort of a scholarly side job, if you like. 505 00:29:44,560 --> 00:29:46,800 Some time ago, I was asked to write an essay 506 00:29:46,800 --> 00:29:49,640 on the fifth book of the Hebrew Bible 507 00:29:49,640 --> 00:29:52,360 - the Book of Deuteronomy in the Dead Sea Scrolls. 508 00:29:52,360 --> 00:29:54,840 This proves to be a really challenging task 509 00:29:54,840 --> 00:29:59,440 because Deuteronomy appears to be everywhere in Dead Sea Scrolls 510 00:29:59,440 --> 00:30:04,200 including the tiny tefillin or phylacteries. 511 00:30:04,200 --> 00:30:08,320 Many of you are familiar with this quite well known Jewish custom 512 00:30:08,320 --> 00:30:12,200 of wearing phylacteries or tefillin. 513 00:30:12,200 --> 00:30:15,560 Fill in small boxes with leather straps. 514 00:30:15,560 --> 00:30:17,840 During morning prayer on weekdays, 515 00:30:17,840 --> 00:30:20,920 one of the two boxes is attached to one's forehead 516 00:30:20,920 --> 00:30:23,760 while the other one goes on the left arm. 517 00:30:23,760 --> 00:30:27,760 And inside these two little boxes are four biblical passages. 518 00:30:27,760 --> 00:30:30,880 The next slide shows a scribe hard at work 519 00:30:30,880 --> 00:30:34,280 to prepare this tefillin slips which contain, 520 00:30:34,280 --> 00:30:38,680 as you may know, pieces from Exodus chapter 13, 521 00:30:38,680 --> 00:30:43,080 verses one through ten and also 11 through 16, 522 00:30:43,080 --> 00:30:46,000 Deuteronomy six, verses four through nine, 523 00:30:46,000 --> 00:30:50,640 and Deuteronomy 11, verses 13 through 21. 524 00:30:50,640 --> 00:30:53,320 One of these passages is particularly well known, 525 00:30:53,320 --> 00:30:55,880 Deuteronomy six, verses four through nine, 526 00:30:55,880 --> 00:30:59,160 which contains the famous (UNKNOWN) Israel, 527 00:30:59,160 --> 00:31:02,240 'the Lord is our God, the Lord alone'. 528 00:31:02,240 --> 00:31:06,520 Well, when you look at the sentence marked in red, 529 00:31:06,520 --> 00:31:07,840 'bind them as a sign on your hand 530 00:31:07,840 --> 00:31:10,720 and let them serve as a symbol on your forehead', 531 00:31:10,720 --> 00:31:14,440 this is a sentence that is commonly cited as the scriptural basis 532 00:31:14,440 --> 00:31:18,600 for the custom of making and wearing tefillin. 533 00:31:18,600 --> 00:31:20,720 However, a reader might wonder 534 00:31:20,720 --> 00:31:24,440 whether this requirement was intended to be understood literally 535 00:31:24,440 --> 00:31:27,280 or rather as a figure of speech. 536 00:31:27,280 --> 00:31:31,240 When this command was first understood literally is unknown. 537 00:31:31,240 --> 00:31:34,840 What we do know, however, is that this custom or custom associated 538 00:31:34,840 --> 00:31:38,240 with such a literal interpretation of Deuteronomy six, 539 00:31:38,240 --> 00:31:42,080 was in place already in 2nd century BCE. 540 00:31:42,080 --> 00:31:43,720 How do we know that? 541 00:31:43,720 --> 00:31:47,120 Well first, there might be a hint to an existence of such a custom. 542 00:31:47,120 --> 00:31:50,120 in the Letter of Aristeas, 543 00:31:50,120 --> 00:31:54,080 a Jewish work written sometime in 2nd century BCE in Greek. 544 00:31:54,080 --> 00:31:56,480 Secondly and far more importantly, 545 00:31:56,480 --> 00:32:00,400 we have in our possession multiple tefillin from the Judean desert. 546 00:32:00,400 --> 00:32:02,960 Predominantly from the caves of Qumran. 547 00:32:02,960 --> 00:32:07,120 And the oldest ones of them are dated on palaeographic grounds 548 00:32:07,120 --> 00:32:09,920 to the 2nd century BCE. 549 00:32:09,920 --> 00:32:11,520 So let me explain a little bit more 550 00:32:11,520 --> 00:32:14,600 what exactly was found among the Qumran scrolls 551 00:32:14,600 --> 00:32:17,560 as far as tefillin are concerned. 552 00:32:17,560 --> 00:32:19,720 We have several complete phylacteries 553 00:32:19,720 --> 00:32:22,560 with slips inside the cases. 554 00:32:23,080 --> 00:32:25,240 In fact, recently, Dr Yonatan Adler 555 00:32:25,240 --> 00:32:28,280 was able to locate, in the depths of a storage, 556 00:32:28,280 --> 00:32:33,960 a box with nine tefillin cases which seemed to have text inside, 557 00:32:33,960 --> 00:32:37,040 and they are still yet to be opened. 558 00:32:37,040 --> 00:32:39,440 In addition to few complete tefillin, 559 00:32:39,440 --> 00:32:44,520 the Judean desert also include multiple tefillin cases which are empty, 560 00:32:44,520 --> 00:32:46,400 some 25 of them, 561 00:32:46,400 --> 00:32:49,440 as well as many tefillin slips out of the boxes, 562 00:32:49,440 --> 00:32:51,320 some 40 of them. 563 00:32:51,320 --> 00:32:53,800 Most of them come from the Qumran caves, 564 00:32:53,800 --> 00:32:56,040 and a few from sites associated 565 00:32:56,040 --> 00:33:00,480 with the Second Jewish revolt against Rome under Bar Kokhba. 566 00:33:01,200 --> 00:33:04,880 Well, this ancient tefillin are remarkable objects. 567 00:33:04,880 --> 00:33:07,000 First, there is a craftsmanship. 568 00:33:07,000 --> 00:33:08,640 The cases are tiny. 569 00:33:08,640 --> 00:33:11,800 For instance, this tefillin published by (INAUDIBLE) 570 00:33:11,800 --> 00:33:14,440 which has four compartments 571 00:33:14,440 --> 00:33:16,960 to house for slips of text, 572 00:33:16,960 --> 00:33:20,360 is only 13mm by 20mm. 573 00:33:20,360 --> 00:33:22,720 Namely, less than an inch. 574 00:33:22,720 --> 00:33:25,800 The texts themselves are also exceedingly small. 575 00:33:25,800 --> 00:33:28,760 Again, taking the (INAUDIBLE) tefillin as an example, 576 00:33:28,760 --> 00:33:34,480 one of the slips measures some 27 by 44mm. 577 00:33:34,480 --> 00:33:36,960 An inch by two inches. 578 00:33:36,960 --> 00:33:40,120 As you can see, they were carefully folded 579 00:33:40,120 --> 00:33:43,800 Into tiny packages and then fastened to prevent unfolding 580 00:33:43,800 --> 00:33:48,760 apparently with the hair of a clean kosher animal such as a goat. 581 00:33:48,760 --> 00:33:50,960 Finally, there is the script. 582 00:33:50,960 --> 00:33:54,760 Many tefillin from the Judean desert feature a tiny script 583 00:33:54,760 --> 00:33:59,360 with letters often ranging between 0.5 and 1mm. 584 00:33:59,840 --> 00:34:02,560 This sort of miniature writing must have required 585 00:34:02,560 --> 00:34:05,760 a remarkable skill and concentration. 586 00:34:05,760 --> 00:34:10,280 In some cases, the script is quite difficult to decipher. 587 00:34:10,280 --> 00:34:13,120 The challenge is not only the small size of the letters 588 00:34:13,120 --> 00:34:15,520 but also the tendency found here and there 589 00:34:15,520 --> 00:34:18,520 to reduce the familiar shapes of the Hebrew letters 590 00:34:18,520 --> 00:34:20,160 to simpler forms. 591 00:34:20,160 --> 00:34:24,120 Apparently, in order to make the process of writing easier and faster. 592 00:34:24,600 --> 00:34:27,080 I would like to offer one example of such a reduction 593 00:34:27,080 --> 00:34:29,680 or simplification, if you like, of the letters 594 00:34:29,680 --> 00:34:32,080 coming to you from a slip of (UNKNOWN) 595 00:34:32,080 --> 00:34:34,280 from the eighth cave of Qumran. 596 00:34:34,280 --> 00:34:39,040 And this image represents two words from Deuteronomy 10, 22. 597 00:34:39,040 --> 00:34:41,960 If you're able to follow Hebrew, you can follow the text 598 00:34:41,960 --> 00:34:45,600 in the red in the square script below the image. 599 00:34:45,600 --> 00:34:49,320 The two words in question are (UNKNOWN) and (UNKNOWN) 600 00:34:49,320 --> 00:34:53,960 rendered into English as 'so many persons went down'. 601 00:34:53,960 --> 00:34:56,240 Please know that there is no space or interval 602 00:34:56,240 --> 00:34:58,400 between the two words at all. 603 00:34:58,400 --> 00:35:00,240 More importantly, I think, 604 00:35:00,240 --> 00:35:04,280 you can see how similar the letters are in the second word. 605 00:35:04,280 --> 00:35:07,840 Without knowing the Biblical passage, would you ever be able to tell 606 00:35:07,840 --> 00:35:11,680 that this four vertical lines are actually four different letters. 607 00:35:11,680 --> 00:35:14,920 (UNKNOWN) 608 00:35:15,520 --> 00:35:17,240 The Qumran tefillin are remarkable 609 00:35:17,240 --> 00:35:19,000 not only because of their physical features 610 00:35:19,000 --> 00:35:21,280 but also because of their contents. 611 00:35:21,280 --> 00:35:23,680 As you may know, Rabbinic law, 'Halakha' 612 00:35:23,680 --> 00:35:26,640 requires a precise and uniform execution 613 00:35:26,640 --> 00:35:29,600 of the slips inserted into the tefillin. 614 00:35:29,600 --> 00:35:33,480 No slightest deviation from the received text of Exodus and Deuteronomy 615 00:35:33,480 --> 00:35:35,200 is allowed. 616 00:35:35,200 --> 00:35:38,480 One of the biggest surprises of the Qumran tefillin, in this regard, 617 00:35:38,480 --> 00:35:42,920 was that multiple tefillin include more biblical text 618 00:35:42,920 --> 00:35:46,160 than traditional or Rabbinic tefillin do. 619 00:35:46,160 --> 00:35:50,240 Thus in Exodus for instance, several verses from the preceding chapter, 620 00:35:50,240 --> 00:35:54,840 Chapter Twelve, verses 43 through 51 are included. 621 00:35:54,840 --> 00:35:56,640 In the case of Deuteronomy, 622 00:35:56,640 --> 00:36:00,440 preceding sections from chapters five, six and ten 623 00:36:00,440 --> 00:36:02,080 are copied. 624 00:36:02,080 --> 00:36:05,080 The inclusion of Deuteronomy five is particularly important 625 00:36:05,080 --> 00:36:08,920 because it contains the famous Ten Commandments. 626 00:36:08,920 --> 00:36:10,480 Besides the tefillin slips 627 00:36:10,480 --> 00:36:13,840 that include large chunks of Exodus and Deuteronomy, 628 00:36:13,840 --> 00:36:16,960 there is also one tefillin slip which is unusual. 629 00:36:16,960 --> 00:36:20,440 It contains a few verses from Shirat Haazinu, 630 00:36:20,440 --> 00:36:24,000 or Moses' song from Deuteronomy 32. 631 00:36:24,520 --> 00:36:28,160 I should make sure now that along with this expansive tefillin, 632 00:36:28,160 --> 00:36:30,840 there are also several phylacteries at Qumran 633 00:36:30,840 --> 00:36:33,760 that have exactly the same biblical passages 634 00:36:33,760 --> 00:36:36,840 as traditional tefillin do. 635 00:36:37,520 --> 00:36:39,400 Most of this tefillin slips from Qumran 636 00:36:39,400 --> 00:36:41,640 were deciphered and published relatively early 637 00:36:41,640 --> 00:36:44,280 by a gifted polygrapher, Józef Milik. 638 00:36:44,280 --> 00:36:47,360 His work on reading and reconstructing these tiny scrolls 639 00:36:47,360 --> 00:36:49,400 is astonishing. 640 00:36:49,400 --> 00:36:53,720 And this brings me back to my little side joke story, if you will. 641 00:36:53,720 --> 00:36:55,800 As I studied the tefillin slips 642 00:36:55,800 --> 00:36:58,560 containing passages from the Book of Deuteronomy, 643 00:36:58,560 --> 00:37:03,080 I came across one slip that Milik left unread. 644 00:37:03,080 --> 00:37:05,480 No that he completely ignored it. No. 645 00:37:05,480 --> 00:37:07,400 He actually masterfully unrolled it 646 00:37:07,400 --> 00:37:10,840 and then reassembled it from several small scraps. 647 00:37:10,840 --> 00:37:13,920 However, he considered it to be 648 00:37:13,920 --> 00:37:18,240 practically indecipherable, to quote his own language. 649 00:37:18,240 --> 00:37:22,160 This tefillin slip is known as 4Q Phylactery T. 650 00:37:22,160 --> 00:37:24,840 Let's take a closer look at it. 651 00:37:25,440 --> 00:37:27,680 What you see on the next slide appears to be the 652 00:37:27,680 --> 00:37:32,240 earliest available photograph of this 4Q Phylactery T. 653 00:37:32,240 --> 00:37:34,480 Taken during the process of initial sifting 654 00:37:34,480 --> 00:37:36,280 and arranging of the fragments, 655 00:37:36,280 --> 00:37:39,440 sometime in 1958. 656 00:37:39,440 --> 00:37:42,440 On this image, it appears still as a folded text. 657 00:37:42,440 --> 00:37:44,320 And many of the fragments surrounding it 658 00:37:44,320 --> 00:37:48,360 belong to other tefillin that Milik read and published. 659 00:37:48,360 --> 00:37:51,360 Clearly, very little can be said about this tiny text 660 00:37:51,360 --> 00:37:55,440 from this particular image at this particular stage. 661 00:37:55,920 --> 00:37:57,920 The next image takes us... 662 00:37:57,920 --> 00:38:02,560 A few years ago taken picture from 2014 663 00:38:02,560 --> 00:38:06,320 and it presents a partially unfolded text. 664 00:38:06,320 --> 00:38:09,520 I'm saying partially unfolded text of fragment one 665 00:38:09,520 --> 00:38:11,680 because the long rectangular piece 666 00:38:11,680 --> 00:38:14,080 in the right bottom corner of the fragment 667 00:38:14,080 --> 00:38:16,720 is actually a sort of multi-layered wad. 668 00:38:16,720 --> 00:38:21,120 A sandwich, if you like, with several layers of text inside. 669 00:38:21,120 --> 00:38:24,760 If unfolded, it would reveal the entire missing part 670 00:38:24,760 --> 00:38:28,000 of the text on the right-hand of the text. 671 00:38:28,000 --> 00:38:30,200 I very much hope that it will be soon opened 672 00:38:30,200 --> 00:38:33,760 by our high skilled curators. 673 00:38:34,520 --> 00:38:36,480 As with other tefillin slips, 674 00:38:36,480 --> 00:38:42,040 this fragment is very small - about 30mm wide and 15mm high. 675 00:38:42,040 --> 00:38:45,520 The letters are tiny too, no more than 1mm high 676 00:38:45,520 --> 00:38:48,920 just like in many other tefillin from Qumran. 677 00:38:48,920 --> 00:38:52,320 And as in several other phylacteries, the height of the letters 678 00:38:52,320 --> 00:38:55,720 Is not only the challenge that I'm dealing with 679 00:38:55,720 --> 00:38:57,800 but also the challenge that 680 00:38:57,800 --> 00:39:01,120 the main letters appear to be very similar in their shape. 681 00:39:01,120 --> 00:39:02,880 Please take a look at this image. 682 00:39:02,880 --> 00:39:06,240 Lots of similarly looking vertical strokes. 683 00:39:06,240 --> 00:39:09,920 In addition, the ink also has spread out some, 684 00:39:09,920 --> 00:39:13,640 blurring the precise contours of the letters. 685 00:39:13,640 --> 00:39:15,240 Well, when I first saw it, 686 00:39:15,240 --> 00:39:19,560 I felt, to quote the well-known musical, excited and scared. 687 00:39:19,560 --> 00:39:21,720 I was excited because I thought, 688 00:39:21,720 --> 00:39:25,720 "How often does one find a text that no one really worked on?" 689 00:39:25,720 --> 00:39:28,440 It seemed to be an incredible opportunity to be a part of, 690 00:39:28,440 --> 00:39:33,440 so to speak, original Dead Sea Scrolls experience deciphering of fragment. 691 00:39:34,120 --> 00:39:37,440 However, I also felt apprehensive because it was very clear to me 692 00:39:37,440 --> 00:39:39,360 that this is a difficult one. 693 00:39:39,360 --> 00:39:41,720 If Milik gave up on it, it has... 694 00:39:41,720 --> 00:39:44,880 must have been very difficult to read. 695 00:39:44,880 --> 00:39:46,680 At the same time, as you know, these days, 696 00:39:46,680 --> 00:39:48,720 these days, we have so many new tools at our disposal 697 00:39:48,720 --> 00:39:51,000 when we work on this text. 698 00:39:51,000 --> 00:39:53,560 First, thanks to IAA, I had an access 699 00:39:53,560 --> 00:39:56,760 to the new high resolution images of this text, 700 00:39:56,760 --> 00:40:00,640 for which I'm very grateful to the Scrolls team at IAA. 701 00:40:00,640 --> 00:40:03,320 Second, I had the software to manipulate these images, 702 00:40:03,320 --> 00:40:06,840 enlarging and changing their features as needed. 703 00:40:06,840 --> 00:40:11,600 Milik, as you will recall, worked with a magnifying glass only. 704 00:40:11,600 --> 00:40:14,280 Finally, I had another great advantage. 705 00:40:14,280 --> 00:40:16,280 My wife is interested in Dead Sea Scrolls 706 00:40:16,280 --> 00:40:19,240 and she happens to be a software engineer, 707 00:40:19,240 --> 00:40:22,520 so she and I decided to join forces. 708 00:40:22,520 --> 00:40:25,640 We spend long hours inspecting the old and new images 709 00:40:25,640 --> 00:40:29,000 trying to match them with the text of Exodus and Deuteronomy 710 00:40:29,000 --> 00:40:32,000 that we expected to find that this fragment. 711 00:40:32,000 --> 00:40:36,200 However, the more we tried, the less likely it seemed to be. 712 00:40:36,200 --> 00:40:39,960 The text simply refused to match those biblical verses. 713 00:40:39,960 --> 00:40:43,680 So what do you do when you have a string of tiny letters, 714 00:40:43,680 --> 00:40:45,680 many of which look alike, 715 00:40:45,680 --> 00:40:49,080 with almost no intervals between the words, 716 00:40:49,080 --> 00:40:53,320 and unlike tefillin slips, you don't know the text. 717 00:40:53,320 --> 00:40:55,680 All of a sudden, it was no more a task 718 00:40:55,680 --> 00:40:58,960 of deciphering an unread tefillin slip 719 00:40:58,960 --> 00:41:02,000 but an apparently unknown document. 720 00:41:02,000 --> 00:41:03,960 So here's what we try to do. 721 00:41:03,960 --> 00:41:07,880 First, we try to identify the letters that were more or less distinct. 722 00:41:07,880 --> 00:41:10,720 And using various charts prepared by other scholars, 723 00:41:10,720 --> 00:41:14,080 figure out what could they be. 724 00:41:14,080 --> 00:41:16,320 We pay particular attention to what appeared to be 725 00:41:16,320 --> 00:41:20,400 the final letters making the ends of the words. 726 00:41:20,400 --> 00:41:22,320 Second, my wife designed a software 727 00:41:22,320 --> 00:41:24,760 that allowed us to search for strings of letters 728 00:41:24,760 --> 00:41:27,360 we thought we were able to recognize 729 00:41:27,360 --> 00:41:29,200 within biblical texts. 730 00:41:29,200 --> 00:41:30,880 We, of course, had no idea 731 00:41:30,880 --> 00:41:33,040 whether there is any biblical passage in this fragment, 732 00:41:33,040 --> 00:41:34,720 but we got lucky. 733 00:41:34,720 --> 00:41:37,480 We were able to identify several words. 734 00:41:37,480 --> 00:41:43,200 In fact, two full lines of text that had a match in the Hebrew Bible. 735 00:41:43,200 --> 00:41:45,840 It wasn't Exodus or Deuteronomy 736 00:41:45,840 --> 00:41:47,760 but rather the book of Psalms. 737 00:41:47,760 --> 00:41:51,920 Psalm 36, verses eight through 11. 738 00:41:51,920 --> 00:41:54,160 As you can see on the slide, 739 00:41:54,160 --> 00:41:55,880 this is not a precise quotation 740 00:41:55,880 --> 00:41:59,680 but some sort of paraphrase of this ritual passage. 741 00:41:59,680 --> 00:42:01,480 The passage itself reads 742 00:42:01,480 --> 00:42:04,520 'All people may take refuge in the shadow of your wings. 743 00:42:04,520 --> 00:42:07,080 They feast on the abundance of your house. 744 00:42:07,080 --> 00:42:10,200 And you give them drink from the river of your delights. 745 00:42:10,200 --> 00:42:13,160 O continue your steadfast love to those who know you 746 00:42:13,160 --> 00:42:16,480 and your salvation to the upright of heart'. 747 00:42:16,480 --> 00:42:20,440 So the words in red have a parallel in the fragment. 748 00:42:20,440 --> 00:42:23,480 They will drink their fill from the shadow of your wings. 749 00:42:23,480 --> 00:42:26,880 They will take refuge with the sadness of your house. 750 00:42:26,880 --> 00:42:28,840 And then we have a missing part. 751 00:42:28,840 --> 00:42:31,400 He will place you on the river of delights. 752 00:42:31,400 --> 00:42:34,760 And the upright of heart will rest. 753 00:42:34,760 --> 00:42:37,360 Well, once we had this match, 754 00:42:37,360 --> 00:42:39,560 we could proceed with more certainty. 755 00:42:39,560 --> 00:42:40,960 For now, we knew a bit more 756 00:42:40,960 --> 00:42:44,800 about the way the scribe executed his letters. 757 00:42:44,800 --> 00:42:47,440 This is not to say we were able to offer a definitive reading 758 00:42:47,440 --> 00:42:50,600 of the entire fragment, this is still a work in progress, 759 00:42:50,600 --> 00:42:53,760 still the preliminary additions that we were able to publish 760 00:42:53,760 --> 00:42:58,720 suggested an addition to this quotation from Psalms 36. 761 00:42:58,720 --> 00:43:02,080 This fragment also contains non-biblical text, 762 00:43:02,080 --> 00:43:04,440 not a passage from the Bible at all, 763 00:43:04,440 --> 00:43:09,920 that deals with such topics as healing, strength and blessing. 764 00:43:10,840 --> 00:43:13,640 Yet there were more surprises in store. 765 00:43:13,640 --> 00:43:16,280 There is another fragment in this tiny scroll. 766 00:43:16,280 --> 00:43:20,200 It is much smaller but it is somewhat easier to read. 767 00:43:20,200 --> 00:43:23,720 As you can see from these two images on this slide, 768 00:43:23,720 --> 00:43:26,040 it is also still partially folded 769 00:43:26,040 --> 00:43:30,360 and needs the loving hand of a curator to unfold and straighten it. 770 00:43:30,360 --> 00:43:34,280 Meanwhile we are able to digitally unfold it using Photoshop. 771 00:43:34,280 --> 00:43:37,920 And you can see the result on the next slide. 772 00:43:38,520 --> 00:43:40,320 As with the previous fragment, 773 00:43:40,320 --> 00:43:44,680 we soon realized that this is not a text of Exodus or Deuteronomy. 774 00:43:44,680 --> 00:43:46,800 (INAUDIBLE) was fragment one. 775 00:43:46,800 --> 00:43:49,760 Some of the wording here is not easy to decipher. 776 00:43:49,760 --> 00:43:55,360 Still in line four, we think one can clearly read the name of Raphael. 777 00:43:55,360 --> 00:43:58,400 As you may know, Raphael is the name of an angel. 778 00:43:58,400 --> 00:44:01,320 In such early texts as first book of Enoch, 779 00:44:01,320 --> 00:44:04,880 he's one of the top angels, one of the archangels. 780 00:44:04,880 --> 00:44:08,320 His name comes from the Hebrew root meaning 'to heal'. 781 00:44:08,320 --> 00:44:11,240 And another early Jewish text, the book of Tobit, 782 00:44:11,240 --> 00:44:14,040 he helps to heal the main protagonist, Tobit, 783 00:44:14,040 --> 00:44:17,240 and restrains a demon named Asmodeus. 784 00:44:17,760 --> 00:44:20,400 In fact, later Jewish magical texts and amulets 785 00:44:20,400 --> 00:44:23,040 frequently invoke the name of Raphael. 786 00:44:23,040 --> 00:44:25,080 But all we know from this text 787 00:44:25,080 --> 00:44:28,920 Is that Rafael will frighten them. 788 00:44:28,920 --> 00:44:30,360 But 'frighten' does not explain 789 00:44:30,360 --> 00:44:33,880 who are implied by the plural feminine 'them'. 790 00:44:33,880 --> 00:44:35,760 However, the Hebrew noun 'ruach', 'spirit' 791 00:44:35,760 --> 00:44:39,720 or (UNKNOWN) in plural, comes to mind. 792 00:44:39,720 --> 00:44:43,520 Interestingly, a similar language of frightening evil spirits 793 00:44:43,520 --> 00:44:45,760 is found in another Dead Sea Scroll. 794 00:44:45,760 --> 00:44:48,720 This text is known as the Song of the Sage. 795 00:44:48,720 --> 00:44:50,880 It appears to contain hymns 796 00:44:50,880 --> 00:44:53,640 that were recited by the Dead Sea Scrolls community 797 00:44:53,640 --> 00:44:56,320 for protection from evil spirits. 798 00:44:56,320 --> 00:44:59,120 So, the text describes the role of the person 799 00:44:59,120 --> 00:45:02,080 entrusted with this task as follows, 800 00:45:02,080 --> 00:45:06,120 'And I, the instructor, proclaim his glorious splendor 801 00:45:06,120 --> 00:45:07,880 so as to frighten 802 00:45:07,880 --> 00:45:12,400 and to terrify all the spirits of the destroying angels'. 803 00:45:12,960 --> 00:45:15,120 Well, having done all this work, 804 00:45:15,120 --> 00:45:17,440 we are now facing the big question. 805 00:45:17,440 --> 00:45:20,600 What is this tiny text that resembles tefillin, 806 00:45:20,600 --> 00:45:24,760 as far as physical features are concerned, and yet contains a text 807 00:45:24,760 --> 00:45:28,760 that does not match other ancient tefillin at all? 808 00:45:28,760 --> 00:45:32,360 Is this another tefillin text? 809 00:45:32,360 --> 00:45:36,320 After all, one of tefillin from Qumran contains Deuteronomy 32, 810 00:45:36,320 --> 00:45:39,600 which is never to be found in other tefillin. 811 00:45:39,600 --> 00:45:43,920 Another option to consider is that this text is an amulet. 812 00:45:43,920 --> 00:45:45,760 The problem with this proposal is that 813 00:45:45,760 --> 00:45:49,920 we have no other contemporary Jewish texts to compare it with. 814 00:45:49,920 --> 00:45:53,280 The earliest Jewish, or should I say Judean text 815 00:45:53,280 --> 00:45:55,560 which is an amulet we possess 816 00:45:55,560 --> 00:45:57,840 is the famous Silver Scrolls 817 00:45:57,840 --> 00:46:02,000 from the burial cave in Ketef Hinnom in Jerusalem. 818 00:46:02,000 --> 00:46:07,280 These tiny silver scrolls are dated to 7th or 6th century BCE. 819 00:46:07,280 --> 00:46:10,560 Then we have reference to written amulets and rabbinic texts, 820 00:46:10,560 --> 00:46:13,160 which are much later. 821 00:46:13,160 --> 00:46:17,280 We also have actual Hebrew and Aramaic amulets 822 00:46:17,280 --> 00:46:20,920 from 4th and 5th century CE onwards. 823 00:46:20,920 --> 00:46:24,800 That's if you like the gap between the Ketef Hinnom amulets 824 00:46:24,800 --> 00:46:27,560 and those from the late antiquity is rather impressive, 825 00:46:27,560 --> 00:46:29,800 it's about 1000 years. 826 00:46:29,800 --> 00:46:33,720 An absence of written Jewish amulets from this entire period of time 827 00:46:33,720 --> 00:46:37,800 has been suggested to be an indication that Jews just abstained 828 00:46:37,800 --> 00:46:41,400 from written amulets in this period of time at all. 829 00:46:41,400 --> 00:46:44,080 Still I think we can compare our little text 830 00:46:44,080 --> 00:46:47,240 with at least the later Jewish amulets. 831 00:46:47,240 --> 00:46:49,320 There are several similarities. 832 00:46:49,320 --> 00:46:51,520 Rabbinic texts, for instance, tell us that 833 00:46:51,520 --> 00:46:54,920 amulets and tefillin often looked alike. 834 00:46:54,920 --> 00:46:58,080 One actually could mistake an amulet for tefillin. 835 00:46:58,080 --> 00:47:01,000 It seems to fit our text rather well. 836 00:47:01,000 --> 00:47:04,160 Rabbis also reported amulets contain biblical texts, 837 00:47:04,160 --> 00:47:07,960 which our text also does, Psalm 36. 838 00:47:07,960 --> 00:47:11,920 The actual later amulets we possess often mention angelic names. 839 00:47:11,920 --> 00:47:15,840 Well, as we could see, our text does too. 840 00:47:15,840 --> 00:47:18,400 But there are also important differences 841 00:47:18,400 --> 00:47:20,240 which are not to be overlooked. 842 00:47:20,240 --> 00:47:24,760 Ancient Jewish amulets, or amulets in general, are often personalized. 843 00:47:24,760 --> 00:47:26,360 They evoke the name of a person 844 00:47:26,360 --> 00:47:29,320 for whom this particular amulet is written. 845 00:47:29,320 --> 00:47:32,200 Also, later Jewish amulets are often very specific. 846 00:47:32,200 --> 00:47:37,920 They aim at particular disease, particular danger or particular desire. 847 00:47:37,920 --> 00:47:41,000 Finally, there's almost invariably 848 00:47:41,000 --> 00:47:43,520 a text or a phrase of adulation, 849 00:47:43,520 --> 00:47:48,440 which is a formula making the demons obey the amulet. 850 00:47:48,440 --> 00:47:52,640 All these features are clearly absent from our text. 851 00:47:52,640 --> 00:47:54,960 Yet I think this does not necessarily rule out 852 00:47:54,960 --> 00:47:59,280 the possibility that our tiny scroll is an amulet, 853 00:47:59,280 --> 00:48:01,960 for these very features are also missing 854 00:48:01,960 --> 00:48:05,760 from the Ketef Hinnom amulets, the early ones. 855 00:48:05,760 --> 00:48:08,720 In fact, in comparison to later Jewish amulets, 856 00:48:08,720 --> 00:48:10,600 Ketef Hinnom amulets seem to be 857 00:48:10,600 --> 00:48:12,880 more of a prophylactic type, if you like. 858 00:48:12,880 --> 00:48:15,720 They're not treating a particular disease or menace 859 00:48:15,720 --> 00:48:18,680 but rather secure protection from evil in general 860 00:48:18,680 --> 00:48:20,880 and a divine blessing. 861 00:48:20,880 --> 00:48:23,040 Perhaps this could be true of our object. 862 00:48:23,040 --> 00:48:25,400 It served a sort of protection 863 00:48:25,400 --> 00:48:27,960 prophylactic purpose, if you like. 864 00:48:27,960 --> 00:48:29,400 So what is it then? 865 00:48:29,400 --> 00:48:32,440 A tefillin, a phylactery or an amulet? 866 00:48:32,440 --> 00:48:35,000 Well, you're, of course, free to make your own judgement 867 00:48:35,000 --> 00:48:38,840 but please allow me to complicate things a little bit further. 868 00:48:38,840 --> 00:48:42,560 Does it really have to be this or that? 869 00:48:42,560 --> 00:48:45,320 Several scholars have argued that tefillin 870 00:48:45,320 --> 00:48:49,400 were apotropaic objects or amulets themselves. 871 00:48:49,400 --> 00:48:52,080 The most detailed argument in support of this thesis 872 00:48:52,080 --> 00:48:55,040 has been recently put forward by (UNKNOWN) 873 00:48:55,040 --> 00:48:57,040 In his important monograph, he argues 874 00:48:57,040 --> 00:49:00,200 that tefillin originated as amulets. 875 00:49:00,200 --> 00:49:02,720 A kind of, if you like, Jewish response 876 00:49:02,720 --> 00:49:06,760 to the prevalence use of amulets in the Greco-Roman world. 877 00:49:06,760 --> 00:49:09,320 The biblical passages utilized in them 878 00:49:09,320 --> 00:49:14,120 intended to secure a long life in the land for their owners. 879 00:49:14,120 --> 00:49:17,760 Well, if this logic is followed one step further, 880 00:49:17,760 --> 00:49:20,880 then what we have at Qumran, maybe, 881 00:49:20,880 --> 00:49:23,400 is a variety of 882 00:49:23,400 --> 00:49:27,000 apotropaic text. A variety of miniature text 883 00:49:27,000 --> 00:49:29,640 serving apotropaic purposes. 884 00:49:29,640 --> 00:49:32,160 The majority of them uses the familiar passages 885 00:49:32,160 --> 00:49:34,160 from Exodus and Deuteronomy. 886 00:49:34,160 --> 00:49:38,040 Some prefer longer stretches of text while others, shorter. 887 00:49:38,040 --> 00:49:42,240 There is also one instance of an amulet using Deuteronomy 32. 888 00:49:42,240 --> 00:49:44,800 And now, there is also a text - our text - 889 00:49:44,800 --> 00:49:46,600 which is a very different animal. 890 00:49:46,600 --> 00:49:52,160 It is citing biblical verses but otherwise, is a non-biblical document. 891 00:49:52,160 --> 00:49:54,160 Well, if you were to agree, 892 00:49:54,160 --> 00:49:56,040 if all this is correct 893 00:49:56,040 --> 00:50:00,560 and all these tiny text we're discussing are amulets in a way, 894 00:50:00,560 --> 00:50:04,600 then we would have still a very interesting question to answer. 895 00:50:04,600 --> 00:50:06,400 Why do most of them 896 00:50:06,400 --> 00:50:08,360 contain Exodus and Deuteronomy 897 00:50:08,360 --> 00:50:12,360 and only one seems to contain a non-biblical text? 898 00:50:12,360 --> 00:50:16,000 All I can suggest at this point is that this may say something 899 00:50:16,000 --> 00:50:20,080 about the community or communities that own this object. 900 00:50:20,080 --> 00:50:23,120 A community or communities that prioritize scripture 901 00:50:23,120 --> 00:50:27,280 over other texts that could secure divine benevolence. 902 00:50:27,760 --> 00:50:31,320 Well, what began as a side job for me became a long-term project. 903 00:50:31,320 --> 00:50:34,160 I've been working on Qumran tefillin ever since. 904 00:50:34,160 --> 00:50:38,800 I think there might be one or two more tiny scrolls 905 00:50:38,800 --> 00:50:42,160 that appear to be tefillin but contain texts that do not really match, 906 00:50:42,160 --> 00:50:44,840 again, Exodus and Deuteronomy. 907 00:50:44,840 --> 00:50:47,200 Yeah. This is a topic for a different presentation. 908 00:50:47,200 --> 00:50:49,200 Thank you. 909 00:50:49,200 --> 00:50:54,280 LAWRENCE: Thank you very much Ariel for this wonderful presentation. 910 00:50:54,280 --> 00:50:59,040 And I think you may have used an amulet to show your success. 911 00:50:59,040 --> 00:51:01,120 And of course, we wish you continued success 912 00:51:01,120 --> 00:51:02,360 in research on tefillin. 913 00:51:02,360 --> 00:51:06,680 And turn over to Pat for our questions. 914 00:51:07,400 --> 00:51:08,840 PATRICK: Great, Thank you very much. 915 00:51:08,840 --> 00:51:10,000 I think we're... 916 00:51:10,000 --> 00:51:13,320 I'm sharing the screen so we can see you. 917 00:51:13,320 --> 00:51:16,000 Professor Feldman, thank you very much. 918 00:51:16,000 --> 00:51:18,960 So we have a few questions lined up already. 919 00:51:18,960 --> 00:51:21,200 But right off the bat, 920 00:51:21,200 --> 00:51:24,880 a couple of questions are asking about just the... 921 00:51:25,640 --> 00:51:32,200 the kind of material context of these tefillin man... 922 00:51:32,200 --> 00:51:35,480 or this tefillin manuscript at least, right? 923 00:51:35,480 --> 00:51:38,440 So what was it? Where were they discovered? 924 00:51:38,440 --> 00:51:40,760 What was their context? 925 00:51:40,760 --> 00:51:44,800 And can we tell whether or not they were written at Qumran 926 00:51:44,800 --> 00:51:48,680 or brought there, like some theories, I suppose, 927 00:51:48,680 --> 00:51:51,400 about the scrolls not all being from Qumran... 928 00:51:51,400 --> 00:51:57,240 being written by sectarians at the site, etc. etc. 929 00:51:57,240 --> 00:51:58,800 So... 930 00:51:58,800 --> 00:52:01,600 ARIEL: Thanks very much. Although those are really big questions. 931 00:52:02,080 --> 00:52:05,120 (INAUDIBLE) the final answer on all of them. 932 00:52:05,120 --> 00:52:07,920 Well, as far as the places where they've been found, 933 00:52:07,920 --> 00:52:10,760 most of them, the majority have been found at Qumran 934 00:52:10,760 --> 00:52:13,120 from what we have from the Judean desert, of course, 935 00:52:13,120 --> 00:52:15,120 and there are several that have been found 936 00:52:15,120 --> 00:52:17,440 in the caves that are related to 937 00:52:17,440 --> 00:52:22,800 those Judeans who were seeking shelter from the Romans apparently 938 00:52:22,800 --> 00:52:25,480 during the Second Revolt against Rome, 939 00:52:25,480 --> 00:52:29,040 but possibly, also in the times of the First Revolt. 940 00:52:29,040 --> 00:52:33,920 So the majority comes from the Dead Sea area, from the caves of Qumran. 941 00:52:33,920 --> 00:52:37,080 Some of them have features 942 00:52:37,080 --> 00:52:40,440 that according to at least to one school of thought, 943 00:52:40,440 --> 00:52:44,480 may suggest that they have been written at Qumran itself 944 00:52:44,480 --> 00:52:48,320 because of particularities of morphology and orthography. 945 00:52:48,320 --> 00:52:52,440 However, it's not entirely clear whether those indications are enough 946 00:52:52,440 --> 00:52:58,360 to secure that sort of very clear location for this text. 947 00:52:58,360 --> 00:53:02,400 There is one or two that are so remarkably resembling 948 00:53:02,400 --> 00:53:06,680 the traditional Jewish tefillin - the rabbinic tefillin - 949 00:53:06,680 --> 00:53:08,680 that an article has been published that suggests 950 00:53:08,680 --> 00:53:10,880 that maybe in those two, 951 00:53:10,880 --> 00:53:15,080 we have an example of a tefillin that was actually pharisaic 952 00:53:15,080 --> 00:53:17,840 and brought by a member perhaps, 953 00:53:17,840 --> 00:53:22,040 adjoining member to Qumran, and, therefore, we have it there. 954 00:53:22,040 --> 00:53:26,200 But so far, these are predominantly theories. 955 00:53:26,200 --> 00:53:30,160 We cannot say anything for sure about the location of those texts. 956 00:53:30,160 --> 00:53:31,440 What is also very interesting 957 00:53:31,440 --> 00:53:34,280 that many of them have been found out of their cases, 958 00:53:34,280 --> 00:53:36,280 out of their little housings, 959 00:53:36,280 --> 00:53:38,880 and this is raising a question why, 960 00:53:38,880 --> 00:53:42,160 what's the reason to have those texts out of those housings 961 00:53:42,160 --> 00:53:44,680 and housings apart. 962 00:53:44,680 --> 00:53:47,160 I think maybe it's a bit premature 963 00:53:47,160 --> 00:53:49,680 to give any final answers to all this. 964 00:53:49,680 --> 00:53:53,240 First because not much work has been done on tefillin. 965 00:53:53,240 --> 00:53:56,000 And secondly, we still have this ninth specimen 966 00:53:56,000 --> 00:53:58,920 waiting to be opened at some point 967 00:53:58,920 --> 00:54:01,800 and many more secrets, I think, will become more apparent 968 00:54:01,800 --> 00:54:06,120 as they go completely out and published. 969 00:54:06,120 --> 00:54:08,040 PATRICK: Yeah. Kind of following up on this. 970 00:54:08,040 --> 00:54:12,080 Is there any connection to burial practices 971 00:54:12,080 --> 00:54:15,320 or being buried in burial areas? 972 00:54:15,880 --> 00:54:18,880 ARIEL: Well, for the Ketef Hinnom amulets, as you will recall, 973 00:54:18,880 --> 00:54:21,760 those two silver scrolls were found, indeed, 974 00:54:21,760 --> 00:54:24,360 in a burial cave in Jerusalem. 975 00:54:24,360 --> 00:54:26,920 And one of the suggestions that scholars have made 976 00:54:26,920 --> 00:54:30,440 is that those two amulets were actually 977 00:54:30,440 --> 00:54:35,080 made or prepared to accompany a person on his journey 978 00:54:35,080 --> 00:54:38,480 or her journey to the other world. 979 00:54:38,480 --> 00:54:40,720 This is not entirely clear too. 980 00:54:40,720 --> 00:54:43,720 These amulets might have been used in one's life as well 981 00:54:43,720 --> 00:54:48,360 and then to continue with that person Into the burial cave. 982 00:54:48,360 --> 00:54:50,960 There is no reasons whatsoever 983 00:54:50,960 --> 00:54:54,760 to assume that tefillin were used in a similar fashion. 984 00:54:56,800 --> 00:54:58,160 PATRICK: Great. 985 00:54:58,160 --> 00:55:02,480 Thank you. So we have a question here about 986 00:55:02,480 --> 00:55:06,280 since some material that you discovered here 987 00:55:06,280 --> 00:55:10,040 related to works of Psalms, 988 00:55:10,040 --> 00:55:12,640 so how do you see these tefillin, 989 00:55:12,640 --> 00:55:16,800 or at least this one, impacting 990 00:55:16,800 --> 00:55:19,680 your view of the use of Psalms, 991 00:55:19,680 --> 00:55:23,680 the textual tradition of Psalms etc.? 992 00:55:23,680 --> 00:55:25,760 ARIEL: Well, this is a wonderful question. 993 00:55:25,760 --> 00:55:28,160 As our listeners may know, 994 00:55:28,160 --> 00:55:31,880 Psalms is a very important book in Jewish tradition 995 00:55:31,880 --> 00:55:35,040 for so many reasons, but also 996 00:55:35,040 --> 00:55:37,440 in the use in amulets. 997 00:55:37,440 --> 00:55:40,680 In fact, it has been suggested that Psalm 91, 998 00:55:40,680 --> 00:55:42,640 the first verses of that Psalm, 999 00:55:42,640 --> 00:55:45,320 are the most widely-used piece of scripture 1000 00:55:45,320 --> 00:55:49,720 In Judea or Judeo-Christian amulets ever. 1001 00:55:49,720 --> 00:55:53,480 So for us, maybe it's an instance of this 1002 00:55:53,480 --> 00:55:55,040 importance of Psalms 1003 00:55:55,040 --> 00:55:59,160 also for that sort of personal piety, if you would like, 1004 00:55:59,160 --> 00:56:02,880 for that personal touch of divine, 1005 00:56:02,880 --> 00:56:06,160 the use of the text as an object of one's body 1006 00:56:06,160 --> 00:56:08,880 to protect or safeguard, 1007 00:56:08,880 --> 00:56:12,520 to seek divine benevolence. 1008 00:56:12,520 --> 00:56:14,840 PATRICK: Great. And on this same topic, 1009 00:56:14,840 --> 00:56:19,920 Professor (UNKNOWN) asks if Psalm 90 is quoted in any tefillin. 1010 00:56:19,920 --> 00:56:21,080 ARIEL: Is quoted where? 1011 00:56:21,080 --> 00:56:22,480 PATRICK: In any tefillin. 1012 00:56:22,480 --> 00:56:23,480 ARIEL: No. No, no. 1013 00:56:23,480 --> 00:56:25,520 Unfortunately not. And I think I probably misspoke, 1014 00:56:25,520 --> 00:56:29,680 it's that Psalm that I was referring to as the most widely-used. 1015 00:56:29,680 --> 00:56:31,280 And unfortunately, we have... 1016 00:56:31,280 --> 00:56:34,040 I mean this is not the probably proper language, 1017 00:56:34,040 --> 00:56:35,560 fortunately, unfortunately. 1018 00:56:35,560 --> 00:56:37,960 We don't have it in those tefillin. 1019 00:56:37,960 --> 00:56:40,480 We don't have it in those little texts. 1020 00:56:40,480 --> 00:56:42,280 I wish we would. 1021 00:56:42,280 --> 00:56:45,440 That would make a very interesting connection 1022 00:56:45,440 --> 00:56:50,600 between the later tradition of including that Psalms in amulets 1023 00:56:50,600 --> 00:56:54,680 and also to such scroll as 11Q11 1024 00:56:54,680 --> 00:56:59,120 which includes that Psalm along with incantations. 1025 00:56:59,120 --> 00:57:03,920 Some of the early examples of incantations we had in our hands. 1026 00:57:03,920 --> 00:57:06,600 PATRICK: Yeah. I mean you put this in the context 1027 00:57:06,600 --> 00:57:09,400 of some of these other Dead Sea Scrolls, 1028 00:57:09,400 --> 00:57:12,640 11Q11, the Songs of the Sage, 1029 00:57:12,640 --> 00:57:16,120 I'm also thinking of - was it? - 4Q444, 1030 00:57:16,120 --> 00:57:19,000 4Q Incantation. 1031 00:57:19,000 --> 00:57:22,040 And those texts are clearly written in larger script, 1032 00:57:22,040 --> 00:57:26,040 they're written to be read and to be used. 1033 00:57:26,040 --> 00:57:28,080 So what might be a way that we can, 1034 00:57:28,080 --> 00:57:30,440 if we start to see connections between these 1035 00:57:30,440 --> 00:57:33,520 and break down the barriers between 1036 00:57:33,520 --> 00:57:36,560 strictly tefillin, strictly amulet etc. 1037 00:57:36,560 --> 00:57:38,720 we start to kind of break down those barriers, 1038 00:57:38,720 --> 00:57:43,000 what sort of generic distinctions can we draw then 1039 00:57:43,000 --> 00:57:47,240 between a text it's clearly been written for reading 1040 00:57:47,240 --> 00:57:50,400 and use in that way 1041 00:57:50,400 --> 00:57:53,720 and one that's been kind of tied up 1042 00:57:53,720 --> 00:57:58,400 and is not being read in the way the tefillin (INAUDIBLE) 1043 00:57:59,040 --> 00:58:00,960 ARIEL: Well, that's precisely the sort of question 1044 00:58:00,960 --> 00:58:04,240 that I'm pondering on quite a bit. 1045 00:58:04,760 --> 00:58:07,280 What amazes me, what excites me, 1046 00:58:07,280 --> 00:58:13,320 is the tiny script which is not really legible, to be honest, 1047 00:58:13,320 --> 00:58:17,200 it was not intended to be read at all. 1048 00:58:17,200 --> 00:58:20,760 The text becomes much less of a text 1049 00:58:20,760 --> 00:58:23,560 but more of an object if you would like, 1050 00:58:23,560 --> 00:58:26,640 a sacred object, an apotropaic object. 1051 00:58:26,640 --> 00:58:29,600 And that, in itself, is a very interesting trajectory 1052 00:58:29,600 --> 00:58:33,720 in which text ceases to be a significant, important, 1053 00:58:33,720 --> 00:58:37,200 because if it's containing something particular, 1054 00:58:37,200 --> 00:58:39,920 because if it's (INAUDIBLE) and it becomes 1055 00:58:39,920 --> 00:58:44,600 an object that can bring some goodies to the person. 1056 00:58:44,600 --> 00:58:50,520 Well, how to explain all this and place it in a neat logical way? 1057 00:58:50,520 --> 00:58:53,360 I don't think we know enough yet. 1058 00:58:53,360 --> 00:58:55,280 I would really postpone this question 1059 00:58:55,280 --> 00:58:58,040 until we have all those additional tefillin 1060 00:58:58,040 --> 00:59:00,360 that Dr Adler was able to find 1061 00:59:00,360 --> 00:59:05,480 Maybe those little boxes have also scriptural text inside of them 1062 00:59:05,480 --> 00:59:08,240 and that will completely change our perspective 1063 00:59:08,240 --> 00:59:11,720 on the frequency or on the percentage of presence 1064 00:59:11,720 --> 00:59:14,360 of scriptural, non-scriptural 1065 00:59:14,360 --> 00:59:19,040 and how all those texts in their miniature form might have been used. 1066 00:59:19,040 --> 00:59:20,280 So, a great question. 1067 00:59:20,280 --> 00:59:22,400 It's really worth a book. 1068 00:59:23,040 --> 00:59:26,800 LAWRENCE: I think we have to move on to the next paper. 1069 00:59:26,800 --> 00:59:29,160 Thank you for this wonderful presentation. 1070 00:59:29,160 --> 00:59:33,360 So we will now be hearing from Daniel Machiela of McMaster University 1071 00:59:33,360 --> 00:59:36,720 on 'Reimagining Israel, the Aramaic Dead Sea Scrolls 1072 00:59:36,720 --> 00:59:40,080 and Judaism in the Hellenistic Period'. 1073 00:59:41,360 --> 00:59:45,280 DANIEL: Well, I wanna start by thanking Larry for the introduction 1074 00:59:45,280 --> 00:59:47,920 and also Larry and all of the organizers 1075 00:59:47,920 --> 00:59:52,480 for both putting together a stellar conference here. 1076 00:59:52,480 --> 00:59:54,840 This is fantastic. And also for the invitation 1077 00:59:54,840 --> 00:59:57,800 to take part in it and to present. 1078 00:59:57,800 --> 01:00:00,560 So, the title of my talk is 1079 01:00:00,560 --> 01:00:03,280 'Reimagining Israel, the Aramaic Dead Sea Scrolls 1080 01:00:03,280 --> 01:00:05,720 and Judaism in the Hellenistic Period', 1081 01:00:05,720 --> 01:00:09,720 which is a little overly ambitious, I realize, in hindsight. 1082 01:00:09,720 --> 01:00:13,160 I'm going to have a little bit more of a focused paper. 1083 01:00:13,160 --> 01:00:15,360 But hopefully, we'll also be able to talk a little bit 1084 01:00:15,360 --> 01:00:19,560 about how these texts do, in many ways, reimagine Israel. 1085 01:00:20,720 --> 01:00:23,800 I want to start just by saying a few words 1086 01:00:23,800 --> 01:00:26,560 about how I got to the study of these texts. 1087 01:00:26,560 --> 01:00:30,040 So, I've been studying the Aramaic scrolls now for a number of years, 1088 01:00:30,040 --> 01:00:32,440 over a decade at least. 1089 01:00:32,440 --> 01:00:34,640 I started during my dissertation where I worked on 1090 01:00:34,640 --> 01:00:37,200 the Genesis Apocryphon primarily. 1091 01:00:37,200 --> 01:00:41,240 This is the picture that you see on the slide in front of you here. 1092 01:00:41,240 --> 01:00:44,080 And when I finished that first phase 1093 01:00:44,080 --> 01:00:47,120 of my research on the Genesis Apocryphon, I thought, 1094 01:00:47,120 --> 01:00:50,080 'Well, that was so fun and so fascinating and so interesting' 1095 01:00:50,080 --> 01:00:53,400 that I wonder what the rest of those Aramaic Scrolls 1096 01:00:53,400 --> 01:00:55,600 might have going on. 1097 01:00:55,600 --> 01:00:59,480 And so, I decided to go through and read the entire Aramaic Corpus 1098 01:00:59,480 --> 01:01:01,520 in the original language. 1099 01:01:01,520 --> 01:01:05,600 And that was fostered by a couple of things. 1100 01:01:05,600 --> 01:01:08,320 The first was, and this was the most important, 1101 01:01:08,320 --> 01:01:13,000 that, at that point, Emile Puech had just published DJD37 1102 01:01:13,000 --> 01:01:17,520 which was the second major volume of Aramaic texts from Qumran. 1103 01:01:17,520 --> 01:01:20,120 And so this, for the first time, made available 1104 01:01:20,120 --> 01:01:21,760 all of the Aramaic texts, 1105 01:01:21,760 --> 01:01:25,400 virtually all of the Aramaic texts from Qumran. 1106 01:01:25,400 --> 01:01:26,720 Along with that, 1107 01:01:26,720 --> 01:01:29,800 well, I had been very interested in the scrolls for quite a while, 1108 01:01:29,800 --> 01:01:34,240 I noticed that most of the attention in studying the scrolls, 1109 01:01:34,240 --> 01:01:36,960 certainly at a popular level, went to 1110 01:01:36,960 --> 01:01:39,440 the biblical texts on the one hand, 1111 01:01:39,440 --> 01:01:43,200 topics like we were hearing about 1112 01:01:43,200 --> 01:01:46,040 from Gene and Molly and Arman yesterday. 1113 01:01:46,040 --> 01:01:49,680 Cannon, how the Biblical text was formed in antiquity, 1114 01:01:49,680 --> 01:01:52,960 and then on the other hand, the sectarian scrolls. 1115 01:01:52,960 --> 01:01:54,720 A lot of attention about this Jewish group 1116 01:01:54,720 --> 01:01:57,720 associated with the site of Qumran and elsewhere. 1117 01:01:58,520 --> 01:02:00,280 But not a lot of attention had been given 1118 01:02:00,280 --> 01:02:02,440 to Aramaic texts relatively speaking, 1119 01:02:02,440 --> 01:02:05,520 so I thought it would be interesting to go and have a look. 1120 01:02:05,520 --> 01:02:10,440 And I came to this corpus of texts with several questions. 1121 01:02:10,440 --> 01:02:12,800 I'll list Just a few of the questions that I had 1122 01:02:12,800 --> 01:02:17,720 when I started out on this mission. 1123 01:02:17,720 --> 01:02:19,640 for you on the slide here. 1124 01:02:19,640 --> 01:02:21,560 First of all, I really did know at the beginning, 1125 01:02:21,560 --> 01:02:25,640 what kind of texts do we find written in Aramaic at Qumran. 1126 01:02:26,200 --> 01:02:32,000 To what extent and what ways are these Aramaic texts a corpus? 1127 01:02:32,000 --> 01:02:34,840 What do we mean by calling them a corpus of Aramaic texts 1128 01:02:34,840 --> 01:02:37,000 if we use that language? 1129 01:02:37,000 --> 01:02:38,920 Does that just mean they're all written in Aramaic 1130 01:02:38,920 --> 01:02:42,360 or are the things that go beyond simply the Aramaic language 1131 01:02:42,360 --> 01:02:46,600 which tie these texts in some way together? 1132 01:02:46,600 --> 01:02:48,960 And then finally, why Aramaic? 1133 01:02:48,960 --> 01:02:52,600 This question already came up with Jim's talk earlier. 1134 01:02:52,600 --> 01:02:54,160 Why would the Visions of Amram there 1135 01:02:54,160 --> 01:02:56,600 be written in Aramaic and not in Hebrew 1136 01:02:56,600 --> 01:02:58,680 and another text in Hebrew? 1137 01:02:58,680 --> 01:02:59,920 So I didn't really have questions, 1138 01:02:59,920 --> 01:03:03,920 I've been slowly formulating my own answers to many of these questions. 1139 01:03:03,920 --> 01:03:06,280 And in what follows, I'm going to deal mostly 1140 01:03:06,280 --> 01:03:09,840 with the first two questions, not so much the why Aramaic 1141 01:03:09,840 --> 01:03:12,200 but if we wanna talk about that during the question session 1142 01:03:12,200 --> 01:03:15,280 and we have time, we certainly can. 1143 01:03:15,280 --> 01:03:19,760 OK. So what am I going to do for the rest of this presentation? 1144 01:03:19,760 --> 01:03:22,320 The first thing I want to do is give a very brief overview 1145 01:03:22,320 --> 01:03:25,480 of the corpus of Aramaic texts because I realize 1146 01:03:25,480 --> 01:03:29,120 there are a lot of people watching and many may not be familiar 1147 01:03:29,120 --> 01:03:31,240 with just what's there in the Aramaic Corpus, 1148 01:03:31,240 --> 01:03:33,760 so I'm going to give a very quick overview. 1149 01:03:33,760 --> 01:03:35,480 And then secondly, this gets to 1150 01:03:35,480 --> 01:03:38,280 the 'reimagining Israel' part a little bit. 1151 01:03:38,280 --> 01:03:40,560 I'm going to focus on one theme 1152 01:03:40,560 --> 01:03:44,480 that I see as being shared between two texts. 1153 01:03:44,480 --> 01:03:50,360 These texts are the Genesis Apocryphon and the Aramaic Levi document. 1154 01:03:50,360 --> 01:03:55,040 And so, we'll take a look at those texts after the corpus is introduced 1155 01:03:55,040 --> 01:03:57,240 and a few passages from them. 1156 01:03:57,240 --> 01:04:01,760 But first, let's just look at the Aramaic scrolls. What do we have? 1157 01:04:01,760 --> 01:04:06,880 First of all, we have around 130 Aramaic manuscripts 1158 01:04:06,880 --> 01:04:09,560 discovered in the caves of Qumran. 1159 01:04:09,560 --> 01:04:12,080 Now of course, you can count differently 1160 01:04:12,080 --> 01:04:15,720 and any different scholar you might ask would give you a different count 1161 01:04:15,720 --> 01:04:19,680 but this is going to be in the range, in the ballpark let's say, 1162 01:04:19,680 --> 01:04:23,320 of the number of manuscripts that we would find. 1163 01:04:24,400 --> 01:04:28,080 Again, depending on how you count all of the manuscripts from Qumran, 1164 01:04:28,080 --> 01:04:34,200 you come up with around 15 percent of the overall Qumran corpus. 1165 01:04:34,200 --> 01:04:37,600 All calculations are somewhere in the mid teens. 1166 01:04:37,600 --> 01:04:41,160 People differ by a percentage or two here or there. 1167 01:04:41,160 --> 01:04:42,920 And it really depends. 1168 01:04:42,920 --> 01:04:46,680 I use DJD39 and Emanuel Tov's count 1169 01:04:46,680 --> 01:04:51,600 of just over 900 manuscripts to get this number of 15 percent. 1170 01:04:52,080 --> 01:04:55,160 So it's not a negligible percentage, that is to say, 1171 01:04:55,160 --> 01:04:56,840 it's not like the Greek texts 1172 01:04:56,840 --> 01:04:59,680 where it's only a few percent of the overall corpus. 1173 01:04:59,680 --> 01:05:04,520 This is fairly significant. It's a considerable percentage. 1174 01:05:04,520 --> 01:05:07,240 And then, how many literary works, 1175 01:05:07,240 --> 01:05:09,680 how many compositions do we find here? 1176 01:05:09,680 --> 01:05:13,400 Well we've got, again, around 30. And I say 'around' 1177 01:05:13,400 --> 01:05:17,920 because scholars will differ on where to draw boundaries between texts. 1178 01:05:17,920 --> 01:05:20,840 Part of the problem here, of course, is that they're so fragmentary. 1179 01:05:20,840 --> 01:05:23,560 Many of these texts, it's very difficult to tell 1180 01:05:23,560 --> 01:05:27,840 whether they might have belonged to the same text or not. 1181 01:05:27,840 --> 01:05:30,000 You know? Speaking... 1182 01:05:30,000 --> 01:05:33,880 Professor VanderKamp was speaking earlier of the Visions of Amram. 1183 01:05:33,880 --> 01:05:36,960 And for example, there you have 4Q549 1184 01:05:36,960 --> 01:05:39,800 which is included as one of the manuscripts of the Visions of Amram 1185 01:05:39,800 --> 01:05:44,400 by some scholars and not included by others. 1186 01:05:44,400 --> 01:05:46,920 And 548 is also discussed a little bit. 1187 01:05:46,920 --> 01:05:50,400 So you've got around 30, give or take a few works, 1188 01:05:50,400 --> 01:05:53,600 depending on how we divide those. 1189 01:05:53,600 --> 01:05:57,120 Or what about the caves? How widely distributed are they? 1190 01:05:57,120 --> 01:06:02,320 Well, we find Aramaic manuscripts in seven out of the 11 caves. 1191 01:06:02,320 --> 01:06:06,360 So, most of the caves had Aramaic writings in them. 1192 01:06:07,000 --> 01:06:10,240 Given the fact that cave seven has Greek texts only 1193 01:06:10,240 --> 01:06:12,880 and some of the other texts have very few literary remains, 1194 01:06:12,880 --> 01:06:17,040 we could say that most of the caves with texts in them 1195 01:06:17,040 --> 01:06:21,160 had Aramaic texts as well as Hebrew texts. 1196 01:06:21,160 --> 01:06:25,200 And then, at least six of the compositions 1197 01:06:25,200 --> 01:06:27,680 were found in more than one cave. 1198 01:06:27,680 --> 01:06:32,240 That is where we have one composition spread out among multiple caves. 1199 01:06:32,240 --> 01:06:35,600 The text across the widest number of caves 1200 01:06:35,600 --> 01:06:37,480 is a text called 'the New Jerusalem'. 1201 01:06:37,480 --> 01:06:39,240 I'll talk about it in just a moment. 1202 01:06:39,240 --> 01:06:42,280 That was found in five different caves. 1203 01:06:42,280 --> 01:06:46,040 Most of the others of these six were in two or three caves. 1204 01:06:46,040 --> 01:06:49,000 OK. So, so much for the stats and the numbers. 1205 01:06:49,000 --> 01:06:54,520 Now, I wanna talk a little bit about how we classify these texts. 1206 01:06:54,520 --> 01:06:57,200 Different scholars have taken... 1207 01:06:57,200 --> 01:06:59,720 have attempts to classify these texts. 1208 01:06:59,720 --> 01:07:03,480 I think especially of (UNKNOWN) classification which is widely used 1209 01:07:03,480 --> 01:07:05,760 and is very helpful. 1210 01:07:05,760 --> 01:07:11,720 She tends to classify the texts based on the topics that they deal with, 1211 01:07:11,720 --> 01:07:13,400 somewhat the literary genre. 1212 01:07:13,400 --> 01:07:16,400 I take a little bit more of a literary genre approach 1213 01:07:16,400 --> 01:07:18,880 in the way that I divide the texts. 1214 01:07:18,880 --> 01:07:22,320 And I have three groupings, which I'm going to run through quickly. 1215 01:07:22,320 --> 01:07:24,280 The first, and by far the largest, 1216 01:07:24,280 --> 01:07:28,120 is what I've called narrative literature composed in Aramaic. 1217 01:07:28,120 --> 01:07:31,240 The important part is composed first in Aramaic, 1218 01:07:31,240 --> 01:07:34,680 related to earlier Biblical traditions. 1219 01:07:34,680 --> 01:07:39,600 And I'll just refer you back to the papers of yesterday afternoon 1220 01:07:39,600 --> 01:07:41,720 as to why I put biblical there 1221 01:07:41,720 --> 01:07:45,720 and also what (UNKNOWN) was saying earlier today. 1222 01:07:46,840 --> 01:07:49,760 We should be very careful how we use that word 1223 01:07:49,760 --> 01:07:52,840 in relation to the Second Temple period if we use it at all. 1224 01:07:52,840 --> 01:07:56,640 But they were clearly related to earlier traditions. 1225 01:07:56,640 --> 01:08:00,520 Other scholars such as (UNKNOWN) 1226 01:08:00,520 --> 01:08:03,600 Yonatan (UNKNOWN) have noticed 1227 01:08:03,600 --> 01:08:10,280 that these narrative texts tend to fall into two different clumps. 1228 01:08:10,280 --> 01:08:13,320 We can put them in two different buckets, I suppose, we could say. 1229 01:08:13,320 --> 01:08:17,920 And they're associated with historical periods in Israel's past. 1230 01:08:17,920 --> 01:08:21,360 The first period that seems to be of interest 1231 01:08:21,360 --> 01:08:25,960 is what's sometimes called the patriarchal and matriarchal period. 1232 01:08:25,960 --> 01:08:28,040 I here call it the period from Enoch 1233 01:08:28,040 --> 01:08:31,160 to the generation of Aaron, Moses and Miriam. 1234 01:08:31,160 --> 01:08:32,920 And then on the other hand, we have a group of texts 1235 01:08:32,920 --> 01:08:37,000 that seem to be focused on the exile - the period of the exile. 1236 01:08:37,000 --> 01:08:40,480 So just to list a few of these texts for you. 1237 01:08:40,480 --> 01:08:44,240 We have a number of writings that are focused on the person of Enoch. 1238 01:08:44,240 --> 01:08:47,200 Enoch was a very popular character in a number these texts. 1239 01:08:47,200 --> 01:08:49,400 And I just list them here for you. 1240 01:08:49,400 --> 01:08:52,080 We have the Genesis Apocryphon, which I'll talk about 1241 01:08:52,080 --> 01:08:54,600 a little later on further. 1242 01:08:54,600 --> 01:08:58,400 We have the New Jerusalem text, which I just mentioned earlier. 1243 01:08:59,240 --> 01:09:02,480 This, it's a little bit difficult to know where to put it. 1244 01:09:02,480 --> 01:09:04,880 (UNKNOWN) has suggested that 1245 01:09:04,880 --> 01:09:07,720 the text is told from the perspective of Jacob, 1246 01:09:07,720 --> 01:09:09,280 and I think he's probably right 1247 01:09:09,280 --> 01:09:12,240 based on some information in Jubilees and elsewhere. 1248 01:09:12,240 --> 01:09:16,440 It's a first person vision of the city of Jerusalem, 1249 01:09:16,440 --> 01:09:22,200 and very interesting, the way Jerusalem is portrayed in this text. 1250 01:09:22,200 --> 01:09:25,640 And then we have a number of texts which are focused on, 1251 01:09:25,640 --> 01:09:27,880 the way I've said it is the priestly line of Levi, 1252 01:09:27,880 --> 01:09:31,280 and this includes the Visions of Amram, which we've already heard about. 1253 01:09:31,280 --> 01:09:35,720 And I'll talk about the Aramaic Levi document in a little while. 1254 01:09:35,720 --> 01:09:38,720 In terms of the exile, 1255 01:09:39,640 --> 01:09:42,600 we have these two texts. 1256 01:09:42,600 --> 01:09:46,480 Tobit takes place during the Assyrian exile. 1257 01:09:46,480 --> 01:09:50,240 'Jews in the Persian Court' is a so-called court tale, 1258 01:09:50,240 --> 01:09:54,680 which is placed in the Persian court. 1259 01:09:54,680 --> 01:09:57,720 And so both of these take place in the exilic period 1260 01:09:57,720 --> 01:10:00,560 and deal specifically with that time frame. 1261 01:10:00,560 --> 01:10:03,800 And then we have a whole bunch of texts really 1262 01:10:03,800 --> 01:10:06,880 which I've gathered here under the term 'Danielic' 1263 01:10:06,880 --> 01:10:09,400 or the heading 'Danielic'. 1264 01:10:09,400 --> 01:10:12,840 This includes the Aramaic portions of the book of Daniel, 1265 01:10:12,840 --> 01:10:16,920 and we might want to include the Hebrew chapter one along with it 1266 01:10:16,920 --> 01:10:18,720 depending on what we think of that chapter 1267 01:10:18,720 --> 01:10:20,880 and whether it's been translated. 1268 01:10:20,880 --> 01:10:23,040 And then a number of other texts which either 1269 01:10:23,040 --> 01:10:25,880 are associated with the figure of Daniel 1270 01:10:25,880 --> 01:10:29,720 or seem, in some way, related to the Aramaic tales of Daniel 1271 01:10:29,720 --> 01:10:32,520 in other ways like the Prayer of Nabonidus 1272 01:10:32,520 --> 01:10:34,360 or the Four Kingdoms text. 1273 01:10:34,360 --> 01:10:37,360 And unfortunately I don't have time to get into all of these 1274 01:10:37,360 --> 01:10:41,280 but ask questions later if you have them. 1275 01:10:41,280 --> 01:10:44,280 Now one last thing before I move on is 1276 01:10:44,280 --> 01:10:48,440 there a number of literary features which, I think, 1277 01:10:48,440 --> 01:10:54,760 tie this group of texts together in various assemblages in various ways. 1278 01:10:54,760 --> 01:10:58,280 One is the literary style or the literary format. 1279 01:10:58,280 --> 01:11:02,520 A really large number of these texts are told in first person narration 1280 01:11:02,520 --> 01:11:04,880 or what we might call pseudepigraphy, 1281 01:11:04,880 --> 01:11:09,160 from the perspective of a character from Israel's past. 1282 01:11:09,160 --> 01:11:12,040 And I think this is very connected 1283 01:11:12,040 --> 01:11:15,560 to what Hindy Najman was talking about earlier today, 1284 01:11:15,560 --> 01:11:18,240 the mimesis which is happening. 1285 01:11:18,240 --> 01:11:22,240 We also have a number of shared subgenres which take place. 1286 01:11:22,240 --> 01:11:24,000 I mentioned court tales already. 1287 01:11:24,000 --> 01:11:26,680 We have a lot of dream visions in these texts. 1288 01:11:26,680 --> 01:11:31,320 We have a lot of discourses, ethical discourses, about wisdom and such 1289 01:11:31,320 --> 01:11:34,120 given from fathers to their children. 1290 01:11:34,120 --> 01:11:37,640 These recur throughout a number of the texts. 1291 01:11:37,640 --> 01:11:42,320 Then we have specific themes such as proper marriage, for instance. 1292 01:11:42,320 --> 01:11:44,520 I think (UNKNOWN) is going to talk about that 1293 01:11:44,520 --> 01:11:49,680 later on in the conference in the Genesis Apocryphon. 1294 01:11:49,680 --> 01:11:52,000 And then we have specific idioms, 1295 01:11:52,000 --> 01:11:55,840 which are used in several different places across the corpus. 1296 01:11:55,840 --> 01:11:58,120 And I won't really have a chance to get into that. 1297 01:11:58,120 --> 01:12:01,120 But my main thesis here is that among these narrative texts, 1298 01:12:01,120 --> 01:12:04,880 we do have a lot of interconnections. 1299 01:12:04,880 --> 01:12:07,240 Very quickly, I'm not going to deal with the other two categories 1300 01:12:07,240 --> 01:12:10,560 in the remainder of my talk but I just wanted to list them. 1301 01:12:10,560 --> 01:12:14,080 The second category that I would put out there 1302 01:12:14,080 --> 01:12:17,120 are translations of earlier Hebrew texts. 1303 01:12:17,120 --> 01:12:20,640 We have two manuscripts which are translations, 1304 01:12:20,640 --> 01:12:23,520 sometimes they're called 'Targums', of the book of Job, 1305 01:12:23,520 --> 01:12:26,320 11Q10 and 4Q157. 1306 01:12:27,040 --> 01:12:30,520 A fair bit of research has been done on these. They're very interesting. 1307 01:12:30,520 --> 01:12:34,400 We also have a text which is sometimes called 1308 01:12:34,400 --> 01:12:37,160 the Targum of Leviticus. 1309 01:12:37,160 --> 01:12:40,120 It's hard to know exactly what it is. What we can say is that 1310 01:12:40,120 --> 01:12:43,880 it's an Aramaic translation of some parts of Leviticus 16 1311 01:12:43,880 --> 01:12:46,200 which is the Day of Atonement ceremony. 1312 01:12:46,200 --> 01:12:49,320 And what exactly this text is is little unclear. 1313 01:12:49,320 --> 01:12:51,280 There is some interesting material characteristics 1314 01:12:51,280 --> 01:12:54,240 about that particular manuscript as well. 1315 01:12:55,320 --> 01:12:59,440 Then as a third group, we have the inevitable 'other' 1316 01:12:59,440 --> 01:13:01,440 or miscellaneous category, 1317 01:13:01,440 --> 01:13:04,480 which catches everything that you didn't see before. 1318 01:13:04,480 --> 01:13:08,200 And in this category, there actually aren't very many texts 1319 01:13:08,200 --> 01:13:12,320 If we look at the Aramaic group as a whole. 1320 01:13:12,320 --> 01:13:14,840 I've listed, I think, most of them here. 1321 01:13:14,840 --> 01:13:17,200 There may be a couple of others that we could include 1322 01:13:17,200 --> 01:13:20,200 but there is a list of false prophets. 1323 01:13:20,200 --> 01:13:23,440 There's a physiognomic text which talks about 1324 01:13:23,440 --> 01:13:27,000 the physical features of a person from head going downward. 1325 01:13:27,000 --> 01:13:30,000 There's a brontological text, which is an omen text, 1326 01:13:30,000 --> 01:13:32,280 which seems to have a lot of parallels 1327 01:13:32,280 --> 01:13:34,800 with other Mesopotamian omen texts. 1328 01:13:34,800 --> 01:13:38,400 And then there is, getting to Ariel Feldman's paper again, 1329 01:13:38,400 --> 01:13:42,280 there's an apotropaic incantation text 1330 01:13:42,280 --> 01:13:46,040 which talks about fevers and chills and things entering one's body 1331 01:13:46,040 --> 01:13:49,320 and seems to be warding off evil against that. 1332 01:13:49,320 --> 01:13:55,480 Like I say, I'm gonna focus now on that first group of scrolls 1333 01:13:55,480 --> 01:14:02,200 and look at just one very narrow small example as an indication of 1334 01:14:02,200 --> 01:14:05,280 some of these interconnections that I've mentioned already. 1335 01:14:05,280 --> 01:14:08,600 And it's a shared theme. 1336 01:14:08,600 --> 01:14:10,920 The shared theme that I wanna talk about 1337 01:14:10,920 --> 01:14:16,040 is the idea of Israel's wisdom as a gift to the nations. 1338 01:14:16,040 --> 01:14:19,200 And this is connected with how Israelites in these texts 1339 01:14:19,200 --> 01:14:23,480 are interacting with foreigners especially. 1340 01:14:23,480 --> 01:14:27,600 I'm gonna begin by looking at the Genesis Apocryphon. 1341 01:14:27,600 --> 01:14:34,320 And the Genesis Apocryphon rewrites, retells, recasts 1342 01:14:34,320 --> 01:14:37,640 the narrative of Genesis. 1343 01:14:37,640 --> 01:14:39,600 It's fragmentary, 1344 01:14:39,600 --> 01:14:42,720 we don't possess the beginning and the end of the scroll, 1345 01:14:42,720 --> 01:14:48,360 but what we have preserves around Genesis five to Genesis 15. 1346 01:14:48,360 --> 01:14:52,560 And at many points, the Genesis Apocryphon greatly expands 1347 01:14:52,560 --> 01:14:55,120 on the Genesis account, 1348 01:14:55,120 --> 01:14:59,640 seeking to solve (UNKNOWN) conundra and do all sorts of other things. 1349 01:14:59,640 --> 01:15:01,800 But we can definitely pick up on some themes, 1350 01:15:01,800 --> 01:15:04,480 the interests of whoever wrote this scroll. 1351 01:15:04,480 --> 01:15:08,080 And I wanna talk about one of those themes for just a few minutes here. 1352 01:15:08,080 --> 01:15:13,960 And that is related to the story of Abram and Sarai in Egypt. 1353 01:15:14,680 --> 01:15:20,280 We hear this story in Genesis 12, it's quite short in Genesis 12 1354 01:15:20,280 --> 01:15:23,480 but it's greatly expanded in the Genesis Apocryphon, 1355 01:15:23,480 --> 01:15:26,840 and I think the way that it's expanded is quite interesting 1356 01:15:26,840 --> 01:15:29,520 and so I wanna take a look at that. 1357 01:15:29,520 --> 01:15:31,160 By the way, in the book of Jubilees, 1358 01:15:31,160 --> 01:15:34,360 which is often compared with the Genesis Apocryphon, 1359 01:15:34,360 --> 01:15:37,800 this story is passed over in almost the quickest way possible. 1360 01:15:37,800 --> 01:15:42,400 So here's one place as many connections as these two texts seem to have 1361 01:15:42,400 --> 01:15:44,400 where we see quite a big difference 1362 01:15:44,400 --> 01:15:46,560 in the way that this story is handled in Jubilees 1363 01:15:46,560 --> 01:15:49,920 versus the way it is in the Genesis Apocryphon. 1364 01:15:49,920 --> 01:15:53,000 Like I said, the text is a little fragmentary. 1365 01:15:53,000 --> 01:15:56,200 So where there are brackets, that means we don't have the text. 1366 01:15:56,200 --> 01:15:58,440 We can reconstruct fairly well, I think, 1367 01:15:58,440 --> 01:16:00,000 the passages that I'm giving you here. 1368 01:16:00,000 --> 01:16:03,080 I'm not going to read this entire passage. 1369 01:16:03,080 --> 01:16:06,400 But it's the first one that I wanna look at together. 1370 01:16:06,400 --> 01:16:11,080 So, Abram and Sarai, at this point, have entered into Egypt. 1371 01:16:11,600 --> 01:16:15,000 And in Genesis 12, we learn that 1372 01:16:15,000 --> 01:16:18,960 Pharaoh was told about Sarai from his officials, 1373 01:16:18,960 --> 01:16:23,920 from some of his wise men, and takes her to be his wife. 1374 01:16:23,920 --> 01:16:28,240 What we aren't told in Genesis 12 is how that happened. 1375 01:16:28,240 --> 01:16:31,760 How did Pharaoh, or Pharaoh's officials, 1376 01:16:31,760 --> 01:16:35,200 first learn about Sarai and Sarai's beauty? 1377 01:16:35,200 --> 01:16:37,680 Rabbinic literature has stories about how this happened 1378 01:16:37,680 --> 01:16:40,600 but we get quite a different story here in the Genesis Apocryphon 1379 01:16:40,600 --> 01:16:45,640 and the Apocrypha dwells on this at some length. 1380 01:16:46,960 --> 01:16:49,280 We find out we're missing the beginning of the text. 1381 01:16:49,280 --> 01:16:51,240 Where you see the ellipsis at the beginning, 1382 01:16:51,240 --> 01:16:54,560 we're missing some parts. But it has to be 1383 01:16:54,560 --> 01:16:58,480 that the pharaoh heard about Abram's wisdom. 1384 01:16:58,480 --> 01:17:02,840 And this was the premise on which he eventually learns about Sarai. 1385 01:17:02,840 --> 01:17:06,800 So, Abram's wisdom must have preceded him. 1386 01:17:06,800 --> 01:17:10,160 And Abram is now speaking in the first person 1387 01:17:10,160 --> 01:17:12,720 and he's telling us that the pharaoh sent 1388 01:17:12,720 --> 01:17:15,280 three of his highest officials to come 1389 01:17:15,280 --> 01:17:19,400 because of my words and because of my wisdom. 1390 01:17:19,400 --> 01:17:23,600 So, this is the reason that we have the officials coming. 1391 01:17:23,600 --> 01:17:27,600 And when they get there, they ask for three things. 1392 01:17:27,600 --> 01:17:32,640 They ask scribal knowledge, wisdom and truth. 1393 01:17:32,640 --> 01:17:35,320 And very interestingly, the response of Abram 1394 01:17:35,320 --> 01:17:39,240 is that he obliges first of all their request. He says, "Alright." 1395 01:17:39,240 --> 01:17:41,800 And he reads the book of Enoch to them. 1396 01:17:41,800 --> 01:17:43,800 This is the way that he fills them in 1397 01:17:43,800 --> 01:17:46,000 on the things that they're seeking to know. 1398 01:17:46,000 --> 01:17:48,960 So what we have here is 1399 01:17:48,960 --> 01:17:52,440 Egyptian knowledge basically being attributed to Abram 1400 01:17:52,440 --> 01:17:56,320 but also Abram being willing to share the knowledge that he has, 1401 01:17:56,320 --> 01:18:00,880 which is his ancestral wisdom, with the Egyptians. 1402 01:18:00,880 --> 01:18:03,040 We lose the text after this for a little while 1403 01:18:03,040 --> 01:18:06,840 but it's clear that there was quite a nice situation 1404 01:18:06,840 --> 01:18:10,120 in which they had a talk about these teachings 1405 01:18:10,120 --> 01:18:11,960 and they had a meal together. 1406 01:18:11,960 --> 01:18:14,840 And this must be the context in which 1407 01:18:14,840 --> 01:18:16,640 they saw, they caught a glimpse of Sarai 1408 01:18:16,640 --> 01:18:20,880 and went back and reported to the pharaoh. 1409 01:18:20,880 --> 01:18:24,680 So, I wanna quickly put up here just the three Aramaic terms 1410 01:18:24,680 --> 01:18:28,280 used for the three attributes that I mentioned earlier. 1411 01:18:28,280 --> 01:18:31,480 (UNKNOWN) 1412 01:18:31,480 --> 01:18:36,640 These are the three things that Abram relates to the Egyptians. 1413 01:18:36,640 --> 01:18:39,080 Moving along, 1414 01:18:39,080 --> 01:18:43,600 the pharaoh takes Sarai. She moves in to be with him. 1415 01:18:43,600 --> 01:18:46,280 This is, again, greatly expanded. 1416 01:18:46,280 --> 01:18:48,480 I just wanna dwell on one more detail, 1417 01:18:48,480 --> 01:18:54,360 and that is that we're told that Abram heals the pharaoh 1418 01:18:54,360 --> 01:18:57,320 from the affliction that we're told he has in Genesis 12. 1419 01:18:57,320 --> 01:19:00,160 Now this, in part, is brought over 1420 01:19:00,160 --> 01:19:04,200 as Moshe Bernstein and others have shown, Daniel Falk as well, 1421 01:19:04,200 --> 01:19:07,280 from Genesis 20 and they're very closely related 1422 01:19:07,280 --> 01:19:10,960 a story of Abimelech and Abram and Sarai. 1423 01:19:10,960 --> 01:19:14,880 But there are a few details that even that doesn't account for. 1424 01:19:14,880 --> 01:19:18,480 And one of those is basically the fact that 1425 01:19:18,480 --> 01:19:21,760 Abram performs an exorcism on the pharaoh 1426 01:19:21,760 --> 01:19:24,440 by casting out an evil spirit from him, 1427 01:19:24,440 --> 01:19:28,360 by praying over him and laying his hand on him. 1428 01:19:28,840 --> 01:19:32,200 The main point I wanna make with this story is that 1429 01:19:32,200 --> 01:19:35,400 we have a very positive portrayal of the interactions 1430 01:19:35,400 --> 01:19:39,760 between the Egyptians and Abram here, 1431 01:19:39,760 --> 01:19:42,680 and the fact that Abraham teaches the Egyptians something. 1432 01:19:42,680 --> 01:19:46,000 He makes a contribution to their knowledge. 1433 01:19:46,640 --> 01:19:49,320 Now, I wanna move along very quickly 1434 01:19:49,320 --> 01:19:54,280 to another text, the Aramaic Levi document. 1435 01:19:54,280 --> 01:19:58,440 This is a text told mostly from the first person perspective, again, 1436 01:19:58,440 --> 01:20:01,160 of the figure of Levi. 1437 01:20:01,160 --> 01:20:04,280 And towards the end of the work, as far as we can tell, 1438 01:20:04,280 --> 01:20:07,640 there is what's often called a wisdom poem. 1439 01:20:07,640 --> 01:20:10,640 And a central part of the wisdom poem, 1440 01:20:10,640 --> 01:20:14,600 which is spoken by Levi to his children, 1441 01:20:14,600 --> 01:20:19,840 it's really an ethical exhortation of sorts, focused on wisdom. 1442 01:20:19,840 --> 01:20:23,280 As an example of this wisdom, he holds forth Joseph 1443 01:20:23,280 --> 01:20:27,240 as the central example, his brother, Joseph. 1444 01:20:27,240 --> 01:20:30,280 And he says that Joseph taught scribal knowledge 1445 01:20:30,280 --> 01:20:33,520 and insight and wisdom 1446 01:20:33,520 --> 01:20:34,920 to kings. 1447 01:20:34,920 --> 01:20:36,320 The text is a little convoluted here 1448 01:20:36,320 --> 01:20:38,640 and I don't have time to get into the textual difficulties, 1449 01:20:38,640 --> 01:20:41,520 but what we clearly have is another triplet 1450 01:20:41,520 --> 01:20:47,880 very like the three terms that we found in the Genesis Apocryphon. 1451 01:20:47,880 --> 01:20:49,400 Here are the terms in Aramaic 1452 01:20:49,400 --> 01:20:51,800 that we find in the Aramaic Levi documents. 1453 01:20:51,800 --> 01:20:54,560 (UNKNOWN) 1454 01:20:54,560 --> 01:20:56,480 And then just here for comparison, again, 1455 01:20:56,480 --> 01:21:01,520 are the three terms that Abram relates in the Genesis Apocryphon, 1456 01:21:01,520 --> 01:21:04,360 again, to the Egyptians. 1457 01:21:04,360 --> 01:21:07,560 So I think this is one connection. And both cases, 1458 01:21:07,560 --> 01:21:10,720 we have Joseph and Abram teaching the Egyptians 1459 01:21:10,720 --> 01:21:12,600 a very similar set of things 1460 01:21:12,600 --> 01:21:16,720 with two of the terms that they're teaching overlapping one another. 1461 01:21:16,720 --> 01:21:20,280 If we keep going further down into the poem, 1462 01:21:20,280 --> 01:21:23,760 we'll see a description that I think could perfectly describe 1463 01:21:23,760 --> 01:21:29,320 Abram's interactions with the Egyptians in the Genesis Apocryphon. 1464 01:21:29,320 --> 01:21:33,040 To every land and place, country to which he will go, 1465 01:21:33,040 --> 01:21:36,800 he has a brother and a friend therein. He's not a foreigner. 1466 01:21:36,800 --> 01:21:40,360 And also they wish to learn from his wisdom. 1467 01:21:40,360 --> 01:21:43,120 His friends are many, his well-wishers are numerous 1468 01:21:43,120 --> 01:21:46,120 and they will seat him on a seat of honor 1469 01:21:46,120 --> 01:21:49,760 in order to hear his wise words. 1470 01:21:49,760 --> 01:21:52,560 Now, what I want to notice is just one detail here at the end, 1471 01:21:52,560 --> 01:21:58,320 and that is that we have these foreigners wanting to learn 1472 01:21:58,320 --> 01:22:01,680 from someone like Joseph because of the wisdom 1473 01:22:01,680 --> 01:22:05,760 and because of the words of a figure like Joseph. 1474 01:22:05,760 --> 01:22:09,200 Now, I will just recall here 1475 01:22:10,120 --> 01:22:13,520 the words from the Genesis Apocryphon. 1476 01:22:13,520 --> 01:22:18,360 The officials of the Egyptians came to see Abram 1477 01:22:18,360 --> 01:22:21,480 because of my words and because of my wisdom. 1478 01:22:21,480 --> 01:22:23,720 So again, we have a very similar situation. 1479 01:22:23,720 --> 01:22:26,160 Again, a very positive portrayal 1480 01:22:26,160 --> 01:22:29,280 of how Joseph is interacting with the Egyptians 1481 01:22:29,280 --> 01:22:32,800 and the idea that there is a real contribution here, that the knowledge, 1482 01:22:32,800 --> 01:22:36,920 the revealed knowledge that people like Joseph and Abram have 1483 01:22:36,920 --> 01:22:41,560 can make a contribution to foreigners like the Egyptians. 1484 01:22:41,560 --> 01:22:47,440 OK. So very quickly, just to sum up and to conclude, 1485 01:22:47,440 --> 01:22:51,480 I would suggest that here we have Israel's role reimagined 1486 01:22:51,480 --> 01:22:55,480 through figures like Abram and Levi or Joseph 1487 01:22:55,480 --> 01:22:58,040 in the Aramaic Levi document. 1488 01:22:58,040 --> 01:23:01,200 And I would suggest that here we have a couple of Aramaic texts 1489 01:23:01,200 --> 01:23:03,600 with some clear similarities. 1490 01:23:03,600 --> 01:23:05,760 These include but aren't limited to the fact 1491 01:23:05,760 --> 01:23:08,040 that they're both in first person narration, 1492 01:23:08,040 --> 01:23:10,360 what we might call pseudepigraphic. 1493 01:23:10,360 --> 01:23:13,160 They're focused on figures from Israel's past. 1494 01:23:13,160 --> 01:23:17,880 They share this theme of teaching wisdom to foreigners 1495 01:23:17,880 --> 01:23:22,960 and they also use similar idioms like these trios of terms 1496 01:23:22,960 --> 01:23:27,440 that we find in the Aramaic Levi document and Genesis Apocryphon. 1497 01:23:27,440 --> 01:23:28,880 Thinking just very quickly about 1498 01:23:28,880 --> 01:23:32,080 the broader historical context for a moment. 1499 01:23:32,080 --> 01:23:33,800 I would make just a couple of points. 1500 01:23:33,800 --> 01:23:36,080 There are many others that could be made. 1501 01:23:36,080 --> 01:23:41,000 But the first is that this theme fits, I think, quite well 1502 01:23:41,000 --> 01:23:43,440 within the Hellenistic compositional setting 1503 01:23:43,440 --> 01:23:47,720 within which most scholars would place these texts. 1504 01:23:47,720 --> 01:23:50,800 Certainly, the Aramaic Levi document has often been proposed 1505 01:23:50,800 --> 01:23:53,920 to be a product of the Hellenistic period. 1506 01:23:53,920 --> 01:23:57,880 And I think we have, in these texts, really 1507 01:23:57,880 --> 01:24:02,040 a reimagining of the roles of figures from Israel's past 1508 01:24:02,040 --> 01:24:04,800 showing that there was something 1509 01:24:04,800 --> 01:24:07,840 which Israel had to offer the foreign nations, 1510 01:24:07,840 --> 01:24:10,520 and we see that in various ways and I think we see it 1511 01:24:10,520 --> 01:24:14,240 in the couple of texts that we just looked that here. 1512 01:24:14,240 --> 01:24:20,160 The other observation is that these texts, 1513 01:24:20,160 --> 01:24:22,960 texts like the ones that we've been looking at so far... 1514 01:24:22,960 --> 01:24:26,480 Excuse me. I'm gonna go back here. 1515 01:24:26,480 --> 01:24:29,320 Move the window so that I can read this. 1516 01:24:29,880 --> 01:24:33,480 They're providing readers and listeners with paradigms really 1517 01:24:33,480 --> 01:24:36,680 for thinking about Israel's inherited wisdom. 1518 01:24:36,680 --> 01:24:38,800 This is something which, of course, 1519 01:24:38,800 --> 01:24:41,800 should be cherished, it should be guarded. 1520 01:24:41,800 --> 01:24:44,080 For people who have looked at the testament of Kohath, 1521 01:24:44,080 --> 01:24:48,240 you'll certainly see this there. It's called Israel's inheritance. 1522 01:24:48,720 --> 01:24:51,720 But it's also something that can be shared with foreigners 1523 01:24:51,720 --> 01:24:54,760 to their benefit, both the benefit I think of the foreigners 1524 01:24:54,760 --> 01:24:58,440 and as we see especially in the Aramaic Levi document, 1525 01:24:58,440 --> 01:25:02,880 also to the benefit of Israelites. 1526 01:25:02,880 --> 01:25:06,680 I would just note very briefly that this is quite a different approach 1527 01:25:06,680 --> 01:25:09,920 than the one we see adopted in the later sectarian texts. 1528 01:25:09,920 --> 01:25:11,600 So, sometimes people ask questions 1529 01:25:11,600 --> 01:25:16,000 about how the Aramaic texts might be related to the sectarian texts. 1530 01:25:16,920 --> 01:25:19,200 I think that's an interesting question to ask, 1531 01:25:19,200 --> 01:25:21,880 but this is one point where we certainly see a great difference 1532 01:25:21,880 --> 01:25:27,560 where the sectarian texts often have antagonism towards outsiders, 1533 01:25:27,560 --> 01:25:32,160 even others of the people of Israel, the Jews at the time. 1534 01:25:32,160 --> 01:25:35,760 So, I think I'm gonna stop there and see if anybody has some questions. 1535 01:25:35,760 --> 01:25:38,520 And I thank you for your attention. 1536 01:25:38,520 --> 01:25:42,480 LAWRENCE: OK. Thank you very much for this reopening of the question 1537 01:25:42,480 --> 01:25:46,120 of trying to generalize on the Aramaic text. 1538 01:25:46,120 --> 01:25:50,360 And we turn over to Patrick for questions. 1539 01:25:50,360 --> 01:25:54,200 PATRICK: Great. Yeah. Thank you Professor Machiela. 1540 01:25:54,880 --> 01:25:57,520 So we have a few questions lined up 1541 01:25:57,520 --> 01:26:02,960 but I wanna just start off by asking a question of my own 1542 01:26:02,960 --> 01:26:08,560 about the relationship of the kind of reimagining Israel's role, 1543 01:26:08,560 --> 01:26:12,520 especially in terms of knowledge and wisdom, 1544 01:26:12,520 --> 01:26:15,800 in relationship to the same sort of impulse that we see 1545 01:26:15,800 --> 01:26:20,240 in some Hellenistic Greek Jewish literature. 1546 01:26:20,240 --> 01:26:24,000 So I'm thinking of like (UNKNOWN) 1547 01:26:24,000 --> 01:26:28,800 who use this... who kind of give this role to Moses, for example. 1548 01:26:28,800 --> 01:26:31,600 I wonder if you could speak to that (INAUDIBLE). 1549 01:26:31,600 --> 01:26:33,680 DANIEL: Yeah. I can, I think 1550 01:26:33,680 --> 01:26:37,800 that the impulse is essentially the same. 1551 01:26:37,800 --> 01:26:41,320 You know? I think we have it showing up 1552 01:26:41,320 --> 01:26:43,880 in different ways in different places during the Hellenistic period 1553 01:26:43,880 --> 01:26:48,760 and I would say that this particular literature is trying, 1554 01:26:49,320 --> 01:26:52,480 in a broad and general way, to do something similar, 1555 01:26:52,480 --> 01:26:56,360 that is to bridge the gap between these ancestral traditions, 1556 01:26:56,360 --> 01:26:58,520 the wisdom that's been received, 1557 01:26:58,520 --> 01:27:01,640 the Hebrew ancestral writings on the one hand 1558 01:27:01,640 --> 01:27:04,440 and the way of life that comes along with that 1559 01:27:04,440 --> 01:27:07,600 and this cultural situation in which 1560 01:27:07,600 --> 01:27:11,720 Israel, at this point, doesn't have political hegemony. 1561 01:27:11,720 --> 01:27:14,560 They're having to live in these foreign cultures. 1562 01:27:14,560 --> 01:27:18,200 And the question is, how one navigates that. And I think that 1563 01:27:18,200 --> 01:27:20,720 like some of the texts that you mentioned 1564 01:27:20,720 --> 01:27:24,040 where that's being done through the figure of Moses. 1565 01:27:24,040 --> 01:27:27,520 Interestingly, Moses really isn't a focus in these texts 1566 01:27:27,520 --> 01:27:31,000 but we have a number of other historical characters where 1567 01:27:31,000 --> 01:27:34,080 I think they're kind of vehicles through which 1568 01:27:34,080 --> 01:27:36,040 some of these issues can be worked through. 1569 01:27:36,040 --> 01:27:39,080 So these stories are reworked and retold in ways 1570 01:27:39,080 --> 01:27:43,440 that will speak to this Hellenistic setting in new ways. 1571 01:27:43,440 --> 01:27:46,680 And so, I guess, that's where my word 'reimagining' comes in 1572 01:27:46,680 --> 01:27:50,520 because these figures are being reimagined to speak to a new situation. 1573 01:27:51,040 --> 01:27:52,800 PATRICK: Agree. Thank you. 1574 01:27:52,800 --> 01:27:59,000 So, we have a question here from Professor Katherine (UNKNOWN) 1575 01:27:59,000 --> 01:28:01,760 Sorry if I'm... 1576 01:28:01,760 --> 01:28:04,840 She asks, 'Given the language ideologies 1577 01:28:04,840 --> 01:28:07,960 of some groups in the Second Temple period, 1578 01:28:07,960 --> 01:28:11,640 can you say something about the relative status of Aramaic 1579 01:28:11,640 --> 01:28:16,240 among the Dead Sea Scrolls compared to Hebrew'. 1580 01:28:16,240 --> 01:28:18,480 DANIEL: Yeah. Well, thank you. That's a great question. 1581 01:28:18,480 --> 01:28:20,640 And there are a couple of ways you could go with this. 1582 01:28:20,640 --> 01:28:26,120 I think in terms of going back to the question of 'why Aramaic?', 1583 01:28:26,120 --> 01:28:27,640 one part of the answer, I think, 1584 01:28:27,640 --> 01:28:31,520 is that Aramaic was a prestige language at this time for sure. 1585 01:28:31,520 --> 01:28:34,760 During the Hellenistic period, we start to see some Greek being used 1586 01:28:34,760 --> 01:28:38,680 but Aramaic, as we see at places like (UNKNOWN) 1587 01:28:38,680 --> 01:28:41,680 is still very much active and there, 1588 01:28:41,680 --> 01:28:44,800 it's the language of the empire. 1589 01:28:44,800 --> 01:28:47,800 And so, I think there was... 1590 01:28:47,800 --> 01:28:50,240 the choice for Aramaic was partly ideological 1591 01:28:50,240 --> 01:28:52,840 in the sense that this was the language of world literature. 1592 01:28:52,840 --> 01:28:57,560 We see things like the (UNKNOWN) inscription and (UNKNOWN) 1593 01:28:57,560 --> 01:29:00,600 other texts being written in Aramaic. 1594 01:29:00,600 --> 01:29:05,960 In terms of the context of Qumran, why Aramaic, 1595 01:29:05,960 --> 01:29:09,600 I think I would go first for a historical explanation there. 1596 01:29:09,600 --> 01:29:13,560 I think that these texts, as VanderKamp mentioned earlier, 1597 01:29:13,560 --> 01:29:18,640 typically are taken to be earlier than the sectarian Hebrew texts. 1598 01:29:18,640 --> 01:29:22,320 And I think the reason why they're in Aramaic 1599 01:29:22,320 --> 01:29:25,960 is mostly because that's the language in which they were composed 1600 01:29:25,960 --> 01:29:28,640 and they were just passed along in that language. 1601 01:29:28,640 --> 01:29:30,920 At some point, there obviously was a desire 1602 01:29:30,920 --> 01:29:33,360 to move back to Hebrew, I think. 1603 01:29:33,360 --> 01:29:36,920 Many have proposed that this happened with the Hasmoneans, 1604 01:29:36,920 --> 01:29:40,000 during the Hasmonean period. I think that's probably right 1605 01:29:40,000 --> 01:29:42,280 to a large extent. 1606 01:29:42,280 --> 01:29:48,120 And the interesting thing is we do find one case - 4Q200. 1607 01:29:48,120 --> 01:29:51,840 There is one Hebrew manuscript of The Book of Tobit. 1608 01:29:51,840 --> 01:29:55,640 There are five, four or five of Aramaic 1609 01:29:55,640 --> 01:29:57,440 and one Hebrew. 1610 01:29:57,440 --> 01:30:00,240 So that to me indicates that someone wanted, 1611 01:30:00,240 --> 01:30:04,040 at some point, to turn that into a Hebrew book rather than, 1612 01:30:04,040 --> 01:30:07,360 or at least translated into Hebrew rather than have it in Aramaic. 1613 01:30:07,360 --> 01:30:11,400 So, that's at least start of an answer. 1614 01:30:11,400 --> 01:30:14,120 LAWRENCE: I think we have to call it quits 1615 01:30:14,120 --> 01:30:17,720 on the discussion of this interesting paper. 1616 01:30:17,720 --> 01:30:20,440 Go on to our last speaker. 1617 01:30:20,440 --> 01:30:22,960 I think we should estimate that we will be ending 1618 01:30:22,960 --> 01:30:25,760 something like ten after three instead of the scheduled time. 1619 01:30:25,760 --> 01:30:27,520 I hope that's OK with everybody 1620 01:30:27,520 --> 01:30:30,640 because we wanna make sure to give every one full time. 1621 01:30:30,640 --> 01:30:34,920 And so, now we will be hearing from Bronson Brown-deVost 1622 01:30:34,920 --> 01:30:39,520 from Georg-August-Universität Göttingen 1623 01:30:39,520 --> 01:30:42,600 on digital exploration of the Dead Sea Scrolls 1624 01:30:42,600 --> 01:30:45,960 with Scripta Qumranica Electronica. OK. 1625 01:30:45,960 --> 01:30:48,280 BRONSON: So, I would like to thank the conference organizers 1626 01:30:48,280 --> 01:30:50,040 for inviting me to speak about 1627 01:30:50,040 --> 01:30:53,200 the Scripta Qumranica Electronica project this afternoon. 1628 01:30:53,200 --> 01:30:55,040 It's actually night for me. 1629 01:30:55,040 --> 01:30:57,840 It's a project that I've had the pleasure to work on 1630 01:30:57,840 --> 01:31:00,280 for the last four years. 1631 01:31:00,280 --> 01:31:04,680 Scripta Qumranica Electronica is a German-Israeli cooperative project 1632 01:31:04,680 --> 01:31:07,200 under the (UNKNOWN) 1633 01:31:07,200 --> 01:31:11,320 And our principal investigators are Reinhard Kratz here in Göttingen, 1634 01:31:11,320 --> 01:31:14,680 Jonathan Ben-Dov in Haifa, now Tel Aviv, 1635 01:31:14,680 --> 01:31:17,440 and Nachum Dershowitz at Tel Aviv. 1636 01:31:17,440 --> 01:31:21,280 We work closely with our project partner, Pnina Shor, 1637 01:31:21,280 --> 01:31:23,720 former director of the Dead Sea Scrolls Unit 1638 01:31:23,720 --> 01:31:28,120 at the Israel Antiquity Authority, 1639 01:31:28,120 --> 01:31:30,800 and her successor, Joe Uziel. 1640 01:31:30,800 --> 01:31:34,680 Ingo Kottsieper been in charge of technical development 1641 01:31:34,680 --> 01:31:37,840 here in Göttingen. Noam Mizrahi is working on 1642 01:31:37,840 --> 01:31:41,640 the analysis of parallel texts. And Daniel Stökl Ben Ezra 1643 01:31:41,640 --> 01:31:46,360 has been working on digital analysis of the scrolls. 1644 01:31:46,360 --> 01:31:47,560 You may have already had the chance 1645 01:31:47,560 --> 01:31:51,240 to hear Pnina and Joe speak yesterday. I hope you did. 1646 01:31:51,240 --> 01:31:53,680 Jonathan will be speaking in the coming days 1647 01:31:53,680 --> 01:31:55,680 as well as some of our other colleagues 1648 01:31:55,680 --> 01:31:59,320 from the Israel Antiquities Authority (INAUDIBLE) 1649 01:31:59,320 --> 01:32:03,160 I hope you get a chance to hear them speak. 1650 01:32:03,160 --> 01:32:05,800 So much for the people working on the project. 1651 01:32:05,800 --> 01:32:10,320 What are we trying to accomplish here in Scripta Qumranica Electronica? 1652 01:32:10,320 --> 01:32:12,440 So I'll just show quickly this slide 1653 01:32:12,440 --> 01:32:16,640 with our principal investigators and project partners. Lots of names. 1654 01:32:17,360 --> 01:32:19,960 And this slide with, again, a lot of names. 1655 01:32:19,960 --> 01:32:23,520 But it's really important for us to show the people who are working 1656 01:32:23,520 --> 01:32:28,400 and have been working on the project. There's been a lot of man hours 1657 01:32:28,400 --> 01:32:32,280 and woman hours and sleepless nights going into this project, 1658 01:32:32,280 --> 01:32:37,440 so everyone's been working very hard and contributing a lot. 1659 01:32:37,920 --> 01:32:40,240 So, so much for that. 1660 01:32:40,240 --> 01:32:44,920 What are we trying to accomplish in Scripta Qumranica Electronica? 1661 01:32:44,920 --> 01:32:47,440 We're creating two main resources, 1662 01:32:47,440 --> 01:32:51,360 a website that provides digital editions of the Dead Sea Scrolls 1663 01:32:51,360 --> 01:32:53,480 and a web-based research environment 1664 01:32:53,480 --> 01:32:56,320 that enables scholars to create and share 1665 01:32:56,320 --> 01:33:01,000 their own digital critical editions of individual manuscripts. 1666 01:33:01,000 --> 01:33:04,880 The website for viewing the SQE digital editions 1667 01:33:04,880 --> 01:33:07,760 will include several exemplary critical editions 1668 01:33:07,760 --> 01:33:11,400 created by members of the project, myself included, 1669 01:33:11,400 --> 01:33:13,320 as well as non-critical editions 1670 01:33:13,320 --> 01:33:18,000 created via automated computer analysis. I really hope. 1671 01:33:18,000 --> 01:33:21,000 The SQE platform has been made possible 1672 01:33:21,000 --> 01:33:25,360 by leveraging the output of two major projects. 1673 01:33:25,360 --> 01:33:27,720 One is the imaging of the scrolls 1674 01:33:27,720 --> 01:33:30,480 carried out by the Israel Antiquities Authority 1675 01:33:30,480 --> 01:33:34,600 under the direction of Pnina Schor for the Leon Levy digital library. 1676 01:33:34,600 --> 01:33:39,960 I'm sure you've already seen many many images from that project. 1677 01:33:39,960 --> 01:33:43,920 And the second source is the transcription and analysis of the scrolls 1678 01:33:43,920 --> 01:33:47,440 under the direction of Reinhard Kratz, Ingo Kottsieper 1679 01:33:47,440 --> 01:33:49,440 and Annette Steudel 1680 01:33:49,440 --> 01:33:53,560 here in Göttingen for the Qumran Wörterbuch Projekt 1681 01:33:53,560 --> 01:33:56,720 at the Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. 1682 01:33:56,720 --> 01:34:00,640 Lots of German words. I promise that's the end of the German. 1683 01:34:01,840 --> 01:34:06,720 So, one of the main questions we came to this project with 1684 01:34:06,720 --> 01:34:10,680 is what exactly defines a digital edition. 1685 01:34:10,680 --> 01:34:13,560 Well, we're still trying to explore that question 1686 01:34:13,560 --> 01:34:15,160 and we will continue to do so 1687 01:34:15,160 --> 01:34:18,480 long after this project reaches its conclusion. 1688 01:34:18,480 --> 01:34:21,520 We do, however, have some main concepts in mind 1689 01:34:21,520 --> 01:34:23,960 which are perhaps easiest to highlight 1690 01:34:24,640 --> 01:34:26,600 in comparison to traditional print editions, 1691 01:34:26,600 --> 01:34:28,480 with which you might be familiar. 1692 01:34:28,480 --> 01:34:31,320 I'll present them here in relation to the project, 1693 01:34:31,320 --> 01:34:35,240 process of an editor creating an edition. 1694 01:34:35,240 --> 01:34:37,600 Firstly, an editor usually begins 1695 01:34:37,600 --> 01:34:41,320 by organizing the materials necessary for creating the edition. 1696 01:34:41,320 --> 01:34:44,280 This may include 1697 01:34:44,280 --> 01:34:48,880 materials previously organized by other colleagues. 1698 01:34:48,880 --> 01:34:50,480 In a final print edition, this information 1699 01:34:50,480 --> 01:34:55,400 will not be easily accessible to a reader, if at all. 1700 01:34:55,400 --> 01:34:58,520 One goal of our digital edition is to make it simple 1701 01:34:58,520 --> 01:35:00,560 for a reader to dig down and access 1702 01:35:00,560 --> 01:35:03,160 the same datasets that the editor used 1703 01:35:03,160 --> 01:35:05,720 to create the digital edition. 1704 01:35:05,720 --> 01:35:07,760 This is done by means of links 1705 01:35:07,760 --> 01:35:10,200 to data stored internally in our database 1706 01:35:10,200 --> 01:35:13,560 as well as links to external resources. 1707 01:35:13,560 --> 01:35:17,920 Secondly, an editor will evaluate this body of evidence 1708 01:35:17,920 --> 01:35:20,400 and decide how to construct the edition 1709 01:35:20,400 --> 01:35:24,640 and what accompanying notes and commentary should be included in it. 1710 01:35:24,640 --> 01:35:26,600 Due to the limitations of print, 1711 01:35:26,600 --> 01:35:29,520 the editor must usually place boundaries 1712 01:35:29,520 --> 01:35:33,040 on how much ancillary information is included in the volume 1713 01:35:33,040 --> 01:35:36,560 and is also usually limited by the print medium itself, 1714 01:35:36,560 --> 01:35:39,560 for instance, life-size mock-ups of a scroll 1715 01:35:39,560 --> 01:35:42,880 are usually difficult to share in many print volumes 1716 01:35:42,880 --> 01:35:46,280 as are large numbers of high resolution images. 1717 01:35:46,280 --> 01:35:49,400 Such restrictions do not typically apply to digital editions 1718 01:35:49,400 --> 01:35:51,880 and it is possible to convey much more 1719 01:35:51,880 --> 01:35:54,600 of the critical editorial process. 1720 01:35:54,600 --> 01:35:59,240 The reader can then test the editorial decisions 1721 01:35:59,720 --> 01:36:01,920 by directly interacting with the primary data 1722 01:36:01,920 --> 01:36:04,000 in the same way that the editor did, 1723 01:36:04,000 --> 01:36:08,640 thus, providing greater opportunities for independent verification. 1724 01:36:08,640 --> 01:36:11,440 Finally, the editor of a print volume 1725 01:36:11,440 --> 01:36:15,680 is confined to the physical spatial limits of a paper book, 1726 01:36:15,680 --> 01:36:18,880 with limits such as size, colour and formatting 1727 01:36:18,880 --> 01:36:23,760 often playing a large role in the presentation of the final product. 1728 01:36:23,760 --> 01:36:26,680 The print edition being a physical object 1729 01:36:26,680 --> 01:36:30,480 can only exist in one place at one point in time. 1730 01:36:30,480 --> 01:36:34,920 It must be transported and is only copied with difficulty. 1731 01:36:34,920 --> 01:36:38,600 A digital edition can transcend many of these bounds 1732 01:36:38,600 --> 01:36:40,280 though it does not always do so. 1733 01:36:40,280 --> 01:36:42,880 It can be copied at virtually no cost 1734 01:36:42,880 --> 01:36:45,320 and transferred at incredible speeds 1735 01:36:45,320 --> 01:36:47,840 It often affords both the editor and the reader 1736 01:36:47,840 --> 01:36:51,440 a greater degree of freedom in the way it is presented. 1737 01:36:51,440 --> 01:36:52,880 And at the end of the day, 1738 01:36:52,880 --> 01:36:55,480 it can also be serialized into a physical form 1739 01:36:55,480 --> 01:37:00,000 such as a book or off prints if somebody wishes to do so. 1740 01:37:00,000 --> 01:37:02,720 The digital edition adds also a further benefit 1741 01:37:02,720 --> 01:37:05,240 to the traditional print edition. 1742 01:37:05,240 --> 01:37:07,520 It can be made malleable such that 1743 01:37:07,520 --> 01:37:10,760 the editor can easily and quickly update it 1744 01:37:10,760 --> 01:37:12,960 should he or she desire to, 1745 01:37:12,960 --> 01:37:16,920 and a user can interact with it dynamically to create derivative works, 1746 01:37:16,920 --> 01:37:20,960 all the while, maintaining clear attribution of origin. 1747 01:37:20,960 --> 01:37:26,560 This is much more difficult to effectively achieve in the print world. 1748 01:37:26,560 --> 01:37:29,560 So, what does our digital edition look like? 1749 01:37:29,560 --> 01:37:31,800 A small group in our project has put together 1750 01:37:31,800 --> 01:37:34,280 some mock-ups with functionality 1751 01:37:34,280 --> 01:37:37,000 that they would like to see in the end product. 1752 01:37:37,680 --> 01:37:41,160 In this window, we see a column from the scroll of 4Q instructions 1753 01:37:41,160 --> 01:37:46,440 or (INAUDIBLE) One of the texts that Daniel must be working on. 1754 01:37:46,440 --> 01:37:50,040 It's a very important wisdom composition at Qumran 1755 01:37:50,040 --> 01:37:54,520 that was unknown to us before the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls. 1756 01:37:54,520 --> 01:37:59,200 Already we see access to lots of information such as Hebrew text, 1757 01:37:59,200 --> 01:38:02,600 including reconstructions, an English translation, 1758 01:38:02,600 --> 01:38:04,960 links to the new high resolution images 1759 01:38:04,960 --> 01:38:07,960 used in the reconstructed column in the middle 1760 01:38:07,960 --> 01:38:12,960 and links to images of these fragments from around 70 years ago. 1761 01:38:12,960 --> 01:38:17,200 Some display options and links to additional data. 1762 01:38:17,200 --> 01:38:21,000 I'll get into this a little more closely in the coming slides. 1763 01:38:21,000 --> 01:38:22,600 It's a lot to take in 1764 01:38:22,600 --> 01:38:26,880 even though it's just a little bit on your computer screen. 1765 01:38:26,880 --> 01:38:32,120 So, the image to the left contains images of fragmentary remains 1766 01:38:32,120 --> 01:38:35,360 overlaid with some reconstructed Hebrew text 1767 01:38:35,360 --> 01:38:38,120 in a font face based upon the letters as found 1768 01:38:38,600 --> 01:38:40,880 in the existing portions of the scroll. 1769 01:38:41,720 --> 01:38:45,560 The English text on the right is a translation of the Hebrew. 1770 01:38:46,120 --> 01:38:48,640 The system allows the English translation 1771 01:38:48,640 --> 01:38:51,280 to be linked to the Hebrew text on the image. 1772 01:38:51,280 --> 01:38:54,280 Thus lay people who know even a little Hebrew 1773 01:38:54,280 --> 01:38:57,640 can easily find the original text for themselves, 1774 01:38:57,640 --> 01:38:59,800 and that's an important thing for our project, 1775 01:38:59,800 --> 01:39:01,680 to get more and more people involved 1776 01:39:01,680 --> 01:39:05,560 in looking at and reading these scrolls. 1777 01:39:06,160 --> 01:39:09,360 Then this pane from the far right provides quick links 1778 01:39:09,360 --> 01:39:11,720 to the images used in the reconstructed column 1779 01:39:11,720 --> 01:39:14,400 along with links to older images that you see 1780 01:39:14,400 --> 01:39:18,800 with the PAM numbers, PAM43.487 and so forth. 1781 01:39:18,800 --> 01:39:23,840 It also has a quick link to the parallel text found in 4Q416. 1782 01:39:23,840 --> 01:39:27,200 So you could click on that and go directly to that text. 1783 01:39:27,200 --> 01:39:29,840 And then it has some additional data 1784 01:39:29,840 --> 01:39:34,680 which would certainly include editor commentary 1785 01:39:34,680 --> 01:39:39,760 and other types of information related to what you see on the screen. 1786 01:39:39,760 --> 01:39:42,760 So, this is just a short glimpse of some of the features 1787 01:39:42,760 --> 01:39:45,920 that will be available when exploring the Dead Sea Scrolls 1788 01:39:45,920 --> 01:39:48,920 in a digital addition on the SQE platform. 1789 01:39:48,920 --> 01:39:51,840 But I would like to turn now from website mock-ups 1790 01:39:51,840 --> 01:39:54,000 to the current virtual research environment 1791 01:39:54,000 --> 01:39:57,920 which we're using to prepare our digital editions. 1792 01:39:57,920 --> 01:40:00,480 And these are not mock-ups. 1793 01:40:00,480 --> 01:40:02,440 So, the virtual research environment 1794 01:40:02,440 --> 01:40:04,480 is currently under heavy development 1795 01:40:04,480 --> 01:40:07,640 and is usable already for several tasks. 1796 01:40:07,640 --> 01:40:10,240 This environment is similar to the online edition 1797 01:40:10,240 --> 01:40:14,760 but adds the opportunity to create and change information. 1798 01:40:14,760 --> 01:40:18,480 It will be published online alongside the digital edition's web site, 1799 01:40:18,480 --> 01:40:22,800 but unlike that website, you can register to use this, 1800 01:40:22,800 --> 01:40:26,480 which is very helpful when you want to save any changes you make. 1801 01:40:26,480 --> 01:40:30,400 Registration will be free and open to all. 1802 01:40:30,400 --> 01:40:34,200 When you first log-on to the virtual research environment, 1803 01:40:34,200 --> 01:40:35,800 you will see a list of additions, 1804 01:40:35,800 --> 01:40:38,800 the ones you have created or work on jointly 1805 01:40:38,800 --> 01:40:44,200 and a list of those provided by the base data stored in our system. 1806 01:40:44,200 --> 01:40:47,880 So you see, for instance up here, personal editions, 1807 01:40:47,880 --> 01:40:52,520 and here, publicly available editions. 1808 01:40:53,520 --> 01:40:57,360 Within any editions that is yours personally or is shared with you, 1809 01:40:57,360 --> 01:41:00,280 you have the option to add further editors. 1810 01:41:00,280 --> 01:41:03,400 The edition can be shared with several levels of permission 1811 01:41:03,400 --> 01:41:05,920 such as read only, write or admin, 1812 01:41:05,920 --> 01:41:08,840 and these are more or less self-explanatory. 1813 01:41:08,840 --> 01:41:13,000 What you don't see going on under the hood, so to speak, 1814 01:41:13,000 --> 01:41:15,680 is a complete editor tracking system. 1815 01:41:15,680 --> 01:41:17,240 This keeps a full record of 1816 01:41:17,240 --> 01:41:20,600 who is responsible for each change in the edition. 1817 01:41:20,600 --> 01:41:24,880 Such a minute accounting of each editor's contribution 1818 01:41:24,880 --> 01:41:26,440 would be impossible in a print edition 1819 01:41:26,440 --> 01:41:29,680 and incredibly distracting if ever attempted. 1820 01:41:29,680 --> 01:41:31,760 The digital platform, however, 1821 01:41:31,760 --> 01:41:36,960 makes such best practices effortless and easily accessible. 1822 01:41:36,960 --> 01:41:42,440 What is more, our system accomplishes all of it edits in real time, 1823 01:41:42,440 --> 01:41:45,880 thus, saving the editor from many confusing circumstances 1824 01:41:45,880 --> 01:41:49,440 created by near contemporaneous edits. 1825 01:41:49,440 --> 01:41:52,000 For instance, 1826 01:41:52,000 --> 01:41:57,120 here we see one editor, the one on top, 1827 01:41:57,120 --> 01:42:00,000 cleaning up the mask for a fragment. 1828 01:42:00,000 --> 01:42:03,480 In this case, the automated masking algorithms 1829 01:42:03,480 --> 01:42:06,000 selected a little too much area and included 1830 01:42:06,000 --> 01:42:09,840 some of the backing material along with the fragment itself. 1831 01:42:09,840 --> 01:42:12,000 The current editor wants to clean it up a bit 1832 01:42:12,000 --> 01:42:16,720 and make the mask conform a bit more closely to the parchment remains. 1833 01:42:16,720 --> 01:42:18,920 At the same time, another editor, 1834 01:42:18,920 --> 01:42:23,040 the one in the bottom pane, is looking at some transcribed text 1835 01:42:23,040 --> 01:42:26,360 next to a cut-out image of the same fragment. 1836 01:42:26,360 --> 01:42:31,520 Now, I want you to watch. Once this editor finishes drawing, 1837 01:42:31,520 --> 01:42:36,520 the editor will save the changes, and if you look at the image here, 1838 01:42:36,520 --> 01:42:39,360 you will see as these changes are saved, 1839 01:42:39,360 --> 01:42:42,200 those changes immediately apply down, 1840 01:42:42,200 --> 01:42:47,280 though I have this on loop, so you're seeing it again. 1841 01:42:48,720 --> 01:42:52,480 So the video I showed here was filmed in real time on my computer. 1842 01:42:52,480 --> 01:42:55,360 So you can see, the time that it takes to save an edit to our database 1843 01:42:55,360 --> 01:42:58,600 and then to broadcast it to all other colleagues 1844 01:42:58,600 --> 01:43:02,280 working on the same manuscript is nearly instantaneous. 1845 01:43:02,280 --> 01:43:06,160 This is really helpful because if a mistake was made, 1846 01:43:06,160 --> 01:43:08,840 the editors could communicate it immediately 1847 01:43:08,840 --> 01:43:12,320 via email, phone or discord or whatever 1848 01:43:12,320 --> 01:43:16,800 while the problem is still fresh in both people's minds. 1849 01:43:17,680 --> 01:43:21,560 I want to slow down for just a bit and highlight the editorial work 1850 01:43:21,560 --> 01:43:24,720 that was going on in the previous slide. 1851 01:43:24,720 --> 01:43:28,160 Each image of a Dead Sea Scrolls fragment 1852 01:43:28,160 --> 01:43:31,520 contains rulers and color calibration meters 1853 01:43:31,520 --> 01:43:35,080 along with a label and a lot of other black background. 1854 01:43:35,080 --> 01:43:38,120 If we want to reconstruct a nice column of text 1855 01:43:38,120 --> 01:43:42,360 like shown in the earlier slides or even an entire scroll, 1856 01:43:42,360 --> 01:43:45,680 we need to extract each fragment from that image. 1857 01:43:45,680 --> 01:43:50,000 This is a process that you saw being carried out in the last slide. 1858 01:43:50,000 --> 01:43:54,440 In essence, we mark one or more regions on an image 1859 01:43:54,440 --> 01:43:56,960 and give them an identification. 1860 01:43:56,960 --> 01:43:59,480 As you see here, we have four regions 1861 01:43:59,480 --> 01:44:02,960 marking the four separate fragments on this one image. 1862 01:44:02,960 --> 01:44:04,960 Maybe there are even five. 1863 01:44:04,960 --> 01:44:08,400 They each have a label in the top left panel. 1864 01:44:08,400 --> 01:44:14,360 9A, 9B, 9C, 9D and 10B. 1865 01:44:14,360 --> 01:44:18,120 Now that the fragments are marked and identified, 1866 01:44:18,120 --> 01:44:22,320 they can be extracted and moved independently of each other, 1867 01:44:22,320 --> 01:44:24,360 which we will see in a moment. 1868 01:44:24,360 --> 01:44:26,600 But first, you may remember that I mentioned 1869 01:44:26,600 --> 01:44:30,400 we often have several images of the same fragment. 1870 01:44:30,400 --> 01:44:32,840 A new one like this, 1871 01:44:32,840 --> 01:44:35,880 and, in fact, we have corresponding images in infrared 1872 01:44:35,880 --> 01:44:39,800 and also with raking bytes from the right and left-hand side. 1873 01:44:39,800 --> 01:44:43,120 We also have older images called the pam series 1874 01:44:43,120 --> 01:44:47,800 which are infrared and grayscale scale images. 1875 01:44:49,440 --> 01:44:52,720 The current system we use will allow us 1876 01:44:52,720 --> 01:44:55,560 to map regions in the new images 1877 01:44:55,560 --> 01:44:58,280 to regions in the pams. 1878 01:44:58,280 --> 01:45:02,160 This mapping will allow to quickly access those older images. 1879 01:45:02,160 --> 01:45:04,400 And you see here, on the bottom, 1880 01:45:04,400 --> 01:45:08,360 a black and white looking image, that is one of the older pams, 1881 01:45:08,360 --> 01:45:10,160 and then one of the newer images 1882 01:45:10,160 --> 01:45:15,000 with the color bars and rulers attached to it. 1883 01:45:16,120 --> 01:45:19,640 The Tel Aviv computer science team has been hard at work 1884 01:45:19,640 --> 01:45:22,200 developing algorithms to automatically find 1885 01:45:22,200 --> 01:45:25,520 any given fragment in the pams. 1886 01:45:25,520 --> 01:45:28,960 We also are working on how to be able to implement a morphing feature 1887 01:45:28,960 --> 01:45:32,160 so that when parchment has shrunk over time, 1888 01:45:32,160 --> 01:45:35,480 we could stretch it back to the form it had in the old pams. 1889 01:45:35,480 --> 01:45:37,840 or also do the reverse. 1890 01:45:37,840 --> 01:45:42,160 Searching the pam images themselves is very important in our field. 1891 01:45:42,160 --> 01:45:45,280 You may have the pleasure to hear (UNKNOWN) speak 1892 01:45:45,280 --> 01:45:48,760 about some of the new fragment identifications he has made. 1893 01:45:48,760 --> 01:45:52,680 There are also exist fragments in the pam images. 1894 01:45:53,640 --> 01:45:56,760 And that have become forgotten over time. 1895 01:45:56,760 --> 01:46:00,120 And by mapping all of the pam images with the new ones, 1896 01:46:00,120 --> 01:46:02,600 we hope to identify those fragments 1897 01:46:02,600 --> 01:46:06,000 that have fallen through the cracks. 1898 01:46:07,320 --> 01:46:10,960 The second tool that you saw in the real time demonstration 1899 01:46:10,960 --> 01:46:13,520 was the text ink mapping tool. 1900 01:46:13,520 --> 01:46:17,920 This tool lets you select a letter from the transcription 1901 01:46:17,920 --> 01:46:21,280 and define ink remains that it corresponds to. 1902 01:46:21,280 --> 01:46:24,480 Here we see a nice (UNKNOWN) 1903 01:46:24,480 --> 01:46:29,080 highlighted in red in the transcription 1904 01:46:29,080 --> 01:46:33,000 together with its corresponding ink remains, 1905 01:46:33,000 --> 01:46:34,920 highlighted in yellow, 1906 01:46:34,920 --> 01:46:37,680 on the fragment. 1907 01:46:37,680 --> 01:46:41,640 We are mapping every bit of ink here for several reasons. 1908 01:46:41,640 --> 01:46:45,200 Firstly, it clarifies to every reader 1909 01:46:45,200 --> 01:46:47,800 exactly what you, as an editor, see. 1910 01:46:47,800 --> 01:46:52,280 This corresponds to the repeatability of editorial analysis, 1911 01:46:52,280 --> 01:46:54,000 I mentioned above. 1912 01:46:54,000 --> 01:46:57,000 This can be especially helpful when looking at particularly small 1913 01:46:57,000 --> 01:47:01,000 or damaged fragments where it is not always so clear 1914 01:47:01,000 --> 01:47:03,640 how an editor is interpreting the ink 1915 01:47:03,640 --> 01:47:06,840 even how he or she is placing the fragment. 1916 01:47:06,840 --> 01:47:11,880 In addition to that, it enables many other computational possibilities. 1917 01:47:11,880 --> 01:47:15,600 For instance, we can automatically create a custom font 1918 01:47:15,600 --> 01:47:18,200 based on the handwriting in a single manuscript, 1919 01:47:18,200 --> 01:47:20,800 which could be helpful for training purposes. 1920 01:47:20,800 --> 01:47:22,720 We can evaluate the likelihood 1921 01:47:22,720 --> 01:47:25,800 of reconstructed text in a fragmentary manuscript 1922 01:47:25,800 --> 01:47:29,360 by comparing the specific dimensions it would likely require 1923 01:47:29,360 --> 01:47:34,600 based on the dimensions we know of the handwriting so far. 1924 01:47:34,600 --> 01:47:39,320 We can also use this empirical data to evaluate damaged letters. 1925 01:47:39,320 --> 01:47:43,040 We can compare the letters of one scroll with those on others 1926 01:47:43,040 --> 01:47:45,400 or we can compare all the letters within a manuscript 1927 01:47:45,400 --> 01:47:48,280 to look for similarities and differences. 1928 01:47:48,280 --> 01:47:52,880 These are all possibilities once we have mapped the ink remains. 1929 01:47:54,400 --> 01:47:57,280 But this is quite tedious to do manually. 1930 01:47:57,280 --> 01:48:00,000 So, our computer science team has been working 1931 01:48:00,000 --> 01:48:02,280 to automate this to some extent. 1932 01:48:02,280 --> 01:48:06,200 Right now, the results are incomplete but look very promising. 1933 01:48:06,200 --> 01:48:08,840 The results above were produced 1934 01:48:08,840 --> 01:48:11,200 in cooperation with the Escripta project, 1935 01:48:11,200 --> 01:48:12,920 which intends to do this sort of thing 1936 01:48:12,920 --> 01:48:16,240 for manuscripts in all languages and periods. 1937 01:48:16,240 --> 01:48:20,400 Here, we see the identification of regions on an image. 1938 01:48:20,400 --> 01:48:25,680 That is the green, red, green, red boxes. 1939 01:48:25,680 --> 01:48:29,680 With the identification of Hebrew letters contained within them, 1940 01:48:29,680 --> 01:48:34,680 which I'm sure is quite difficult to see on your screens, I apologize. 1941 01:48:34,680 --> 01:48:38,480 But the results here are astonishingly good. 1942 01:48:38,480 --> 01:48:42,680 We hope that this technology in conjunction with some other processes 1943 01:48:42,680 --> 01:48:47,400 will enable us to create serviceable editions for the entire corpus. 1944 01:48:47,400 --> 01:48:50,120 Granted, they won't be as curated 1945 01:48:50,120 --> 01:48:53,400 as well as the exemplary editions that we are preparing 1946 01:48:53,400 --> 01:48:59,200 but they will be a very good base to build upon. 1947 01:48:59,200 --> 01:49:01,880 So how does this all come together? 1948 01:49:01,880 --> 01:49:05,480 We have cut out fragment images 1949 01:49:05,480 --> 01:49:08,200 that can be moved independently of each other, 1950 01:49:08,200 --> 01:49:11,520 we have mappings of ink to transcription, 1951 01:49:11,520 --> 01:49:14,680 and we also have the ability to situate the fragments 1952 01:49:14,680 --> 01:49:17,480 on the virtual canvas, so to speak. 1953 01:49:17,480 --> 01:49:21,560 All of this comes together to facilitate what we see here. 1954 01:49:21,560 --> 01:49:25,800 Three pieces that make a direct join with each other 1955 01:49:25,800 --> 01:49:29,720 and fit so closely that we can find complete letters 1956 01:49:29,720 --> 01:49:34,640 which were only fragmentary on the individual pieces themselves. 1957 01:49:35,200 --> 01:49:39,560 All the data used to create this is stored in a database 1958 01:49:39,560 --> 01:49:44,200 with proper attribution and the process is completely repeatable 1959 01:49:44,200 --> 01:49:48,120 by anyone else who cares to download the editorial information 1960 01:49:48,120 --> 01:49:50,440 and apply it to the images. 1961 01:49:50,440 --> 01:49:52,960 We do not actually create new images. 1962 01:49:52,960 --> 01:49:56,320 They are cropped dynamically in the browser. 1963 01:49:56,320 --> 01:49:59,880 So we have no need to create all sorts of new custom images 1964 01:49:59,880 --> 01:50:02,440 every time somebody makes a small change. 1965 01:50:02,440 --> 01:50:05,440 This has the added benefit that you can always quickly get back 1966 01:50:05,440 --> 01:50:08,160 to the raw untouched data. 1967 01:50:08,160 --> 01:50:09,920 An editor can attach comments 1968 01:50:09,920 --> 01:50:13,400 to virtually any part of the process described above 1969 01:50:13,400 --> 01:50:18,240 in order to describe, in order to explain the decisions that were made 1970 01:50:18,240 --> 01:50:22,160 or to provide ancillary information. 1971 01:50:22,920 --> 01:50:26,680 Now, perhaps time will allow me for a few closing remarks 1972 01:50:26,680 --> 01:50:29,000 about how we designed our system 1973 01:50:29,000 --> 01:50:31,520 and the principles upon which we operate. 1974 01:50:31,520 --> 01:50:34,480 Though I fear that many... it may only succeed 1975 01:50:34,480 --> 01:50:37,920 in putting the vast majority of our audience to sleep at this point, 1976 01:50:37,920 --> 01:50:40,200 and it's - I know - just late afternoon for you 1977 01:50:40,200 --> 01:50:42,720 so you probably don't wanna go to bed just yet, 1978 01:50:42,720 --> 01:50:46,040 but maybe you can watch this again later. 1979 01:50:46,040 --> 01:50:49,760 As you've already seen, we have a website, two websites in fact, 1980 01:50:49,760 --> 01:50:52,200 that gather information from our data servers 1981 01:50:52,200 --> 01:50:54,440 and display it on the screen. 1982 01:50:54,440 --> 01:50:57,440 This is probably rather apparent to everyone. 1983 01:50:57,440 --> 01:51:01,040 What you don't see behind the scenes are two components. 1984 01:51:01,040 --> 01:51:05,320 An API server and a database. 1985 01:51:05,320 --> 01:51:08,440 Most of you probably have some idea what a database is. 1986 01:51:08,440 --> 01:51:11,920 For us, it is a, so called, single source of truth. 1987 01:51:11,920 --> 01:51:15,360 If data is in there, it will be accessible for the long term. 1988 01:51:15,360 --> 01:51:18,800 If it is not in there, then it will disappear from your screen 1989 01:51:18,800 --> 01:51:21,200 the next time you reload the website. 1990 01:51:21,200 --> 01:51:26,720 What is perhaps not so clear is the SQE API server or, better, servers. 1991 01:51:26,720 --> 01:51:29,880 This is the gatekeeper to the database. 1992 01:51:29,880 --> 01:51:32,800 When a website tries to get information from the database, 1993 01:51:32,800 --> 01:51:36,200 it asks the SQE API to go fetch it. 1994 01:51:36,200 --> 01:51:38,040 The API decides whether the user 1995 01:51:38,040 --> 01:51:40,400 really is allowed to get that information. 1996 01:51:40,400 --> 01:51:42,920 It also packages the information 1997 01:51:42,920 --> 01:51:47,200 in a way that is easy for the user to read and understand. 1998 01:51:47,200 --> 01:51:51,520 The same thing happens when a user tries to edit or create data. 1999 01:51:51,520 --> 01:51:53,760 The API checks whether the user 2000 01:51:53,760 --> 01:51:56,800 is allowed to create or edit such information. 2001 01:51:56,800 --> 01:51:59,960 You may remember the permissions that I mentioned earlier. 2002 01:51:59,960 --> 01:52:03,680 And then, it writes the data to the database. 2003 01:52:03,680 --> 01:52:06,800 And finally, it notifies all other relevant parties 2004 01:52:06,800 --> 01:52:09,800 that a change has been made. 2005 01:52:10,800 --> 01:52:15,520 I will end with an example of why we make our API publicly accessible 2006 01:52:15,520 --> 01:52:19,240 and how it fits with our hopes for the future. 2007 01:52:19,240 --> 01:52:24,080 Here is the output of a simple Python program I wrote last week. 2008 01:52:24,080 --> 01:52:29,840 It requests data about the letter forms directly from the SQE API. 2009 01:52:29,840 --> 01:52:32,520 Then it analyzes the information 2010 01:52:32,520 --> 01:52:37,400 and finds the prototypical or most common form of a letter. 2011 01:52:37,400 --> 01:52:40,320 Here we see that it sifts through many damaged forms 2012 01:52:40,320 --> 01:52:44,200 of the letter 'aleph' and forms in several orientations, 2013 01:52:44,200 --> 01:52:48,760 and in the end, it comes up with a pretty good looking aleph. 2014 01:52:48,760 --> 01:52:50,080 Perhaps a tool like this 2015 01:52:50,080 --> 01:52:53,080 will become an official part of the SQE websites 2016 01:52:53,080 --> 01:52:54,800 but perhaps it won't. 2017 01:52:54,800 --> 01:52:57,440 The importance of making the API accessible 2018 01:52:57,440 --> 01:52:59,360 is that anyone who wants to move 2019 01:52:59,360 --> 01:53:03,440 beyond the common tools we create on the websites 2020 01:53:03,440 --> 01:53:07,800 is allowed to do so and enabled to do it. 2021 01:53:09,360 --> 01:53:16,200 In closing, SQE is committed to open access and open source licensing. 2022 01:53:16,200 --> 01:53:19,240 All of our tools, from the website to the API 2023 01:53:19,240 --> 01:53:24,720 to the database, are available with MIT licences on github. 2024 01:53:24,720 --> 01:53:28,560 All our data is licensed with Creative Commons licensing. 2025 01:53:28,560 --> 01:53:30,880 What is more, when the websites go live, 2026 01:53:30,880 --> 01:53:33,560 our APIs will be directly accessible 2027 01:53:33,560 --> 01:53:37,200 for people to create new and different tools, should they wish to. 2028 01:53:37,200 --> 01:53:41,720 Even as we push forward rapidly to complete our present goals, 2029 01:53:41,720 --> 01:53:43,640 we also keep an eye to the future. 2030 01:53:43,640 --> 01:53:47,040 We have high hopes for what SQE will soon become. 2031 01:53:47,040 --> 01:53:51,160 And we can only imagine what will happen after that. 2032 01:53:51,160 --> 01:53:53,280 Thank you very much for your time. 2033 01:53:53,280 --> 01:53:56,400 LAWRENCE: OK. And thank you for this fascinating presentation. 2034 01:53:56,400 --> 01:54:00,520 Now, we turn it over to Patrick for questions. 2035 01:54:01,840 --> 01:54:04,880 PATRICK: Thank you very much. 2036 01:54:04,880 --> 01:54:07,520 So you might have answered this at the outset, 2037 01:54:07,520 --> 01:54:11,400 but there's a couple of questions just about 2038 01:54:11,400 --> 01:54:16,720 the general timeline for SQE and its availability for use 2039 01:54:16,720 --> 01:54:19,640 by scholars, the public etc. 2040 01:54:19,640 --> 01:54:23,920 BRONSON: Yeah. So kind of the harsh thing is 2041 01:54:23,920 --> 01:54:28,080 I stop getting paid in June of next year, I believe. 2042 01:54:28,080 --> 01:54:31,760 And so, it should be done before that. 2043 01:54:31,760 --> 01:54:34,160 PATRICK: Alright. 2044 01:54:34,840 --> 01:54:38,720 BRONSON: I wish I had more time but these are the limits. 2045 01:54:38,720 --> 01:54:41,040 PATRICK: Terrific. Thank you. 2046 01:54:41,040 --> 01:54:44,880 So let's see. Here, we have 2047 01:54:44,880 --> 01:54:46,560 a couple of other questions. 2048 01:54:46,560 --> 01:54:49,960 One about the use of semantic technology 2049 01:54:49,960 --> 01:54:53,040 and how language is handled, 2050 01:54:53,040 --> 01:54:55,720 and if you could just speak to that a little bit. 2051 01:54:55,720 --> 01:54:56,840 BRONSON: Sure. Do you know... 2052 01:54:56,840 --> 01:54:59,640 Are they talking about semantic web type stuff 2053 01:54:59,640 --> 01:55:00,960 or about the terms that we use? 2054 01:55:00,960 --> 01:55:02,560 PATRICK: (INAUDIBLE) databases. 2055 01:55:02,560 --> 01:55:04,720 BRONSON: OK. Great. 2056 01:55:04,720 --> 01:55:06,880 So yeah. This is kind of a cool thing. 2057 01:55:06,880 --> 01:55:10,720 So technically, in the back end of our project, 2058 01:55:10,720 --> 01:55:14,120 we use an SQL database. 2059 01:55:14,120 --> 01:55:17,240 So it's a really old timey traditional thing. 2060 01:55:17,240 --> 01:55:21,520 But in fact, a lot of the data structures we use, 2061 01:55:21,520 --> 01:55:24,960 for instance, the way we string words together, is a graph. 2062 01:55:24,960 --> 01:55:27,800 It's a directed acyclic graph. 2063 01:55:27,800 --> 01:55:32,400 And so, while we're not using something like Neo4j or Ontotext, 2064 01:55:32,400 --> 01:55:36,560 we are using graph type data structures. 2065 01:55:36,560 --> 01:55:38,920 And then as far as the semantic... 2066 01:55:38,920 --> 01:55:40,960 the whole semantic question goes, 2067 01:55:40,960 --> 01:55:44,520 this is something that's kind of close to my heart. 2068 01:55:44,520 --> 01:55:46,960 You can throw a bunch of data out there 2069 01:55:46,960 --> 01:55:49,680 but if you don't describe really carefully 2070 01:55:49,680 --> 01:55:52,560 what it is and what you meant for it to be, 2071 01:55:52,560 --> 01:55:56,840 it becomes kind of junk that people have to sift through. 2072 01:55:56,840 --> 01:56:01,440 And so, while we are not yet exactly hooked up 2073 01:56:01,440 --> 01:56:07,680 with using semantic ontologies, like an owl description, 2074 01:56:07,680 --> 01:56:12,280 we are moving in that direction to be able to support that as well. 2075 01:56:12,280 --> 01:56:14,720 And one of the ways that we would like 2076 01:56:14,720 --> 01:56:16,960 to interface with the wider community 2077 01:56:16,960 --> 01:56:20,680 is by outputting our text also as TEI. 2078 01:56:20,680 --> 01:56:25,280 So then, it would have a bit of a semantic element to it, 2079 01:56:25,280 --> 01:56:29,680 although TEI is not easy from a semantic... 2080 01:56:29,680 --> 01:56:34,520 It's not a semantic definition. 2081 01:56:34,520 --> 01:56:35,520 I hope that helps. 2082 01:56:35,520 --> 01:56:37,160 PATRICK: Yeah. Thank you. 2083 01:56:37,160 --> 01:56:40,800 So maybe this is building off of the same kind of issue 2084 01:56:40,800 --> 01:56:43,080 in terms of the technology here. 2085 01:56:43,080 --> 01:56:47,280 But we also have a question about the use of machine learning 2086 01:56:47,280 --> 01:56:50,640 to train neural networks to read through the scrolls 2087 01:56:50,640 --> 01:56:53,120 or bring fragments together or how that might 2088 01:56:53,120 --> 01:56:56,000 kind of contribute to this process. 2089 01:56:56,000 --> 01:56:59,480 BRONSON: Yeah. So our Tel Aviv team, 2090 01:56:59,480 --> 01:57:01,680 the head of that is Nachum Dershowitz, 2091 01:57:01,680 --> 01:57:04,240 who is an ex world expert in machine learning, 2092 01:57:04,240 --> 01:57:07,120 as well as Lior Wolf, 2093 01:57:07,120 --> 01:57:09,440 who is an advisor for the project. 2094 01:57:09,440 --> 01:57:11,480 And so, there's a lot of different places 2095 01:57:11,480 --> 01:57:13,760 where we use neural networks. 2096 01:57:14,280 --> 01:57:19,800 And we are using that, for instance, in the removal of background. 2097 01:57:19,800 --> 01:57:23,800 That uses some components of a AI. 2098 01:57:24,400 --> 01:57:28,800 What I just showed with the brief attempt to use machine learning 2099 01:57:28,800 --> 01:57:31,560 to isolate the letters on the fragment, 2100 01:57:31,560 --> 01:57:35,760 that's using neural networks in several different layers, 2101 01:57:35,760 --> 01:57:40,080 LSTMs and things like this. A lot of jargon to throw at you. 2102 01:57:40,080 --> 01:57:42,360 But the long and short of it is 2103 01:57:42,360 --> 01:57:45,520 what we see happening in this project which is really exciting 2104 01:57:45,520 --> 01:57:50,760 is this interface between what machines can do and what humans can do, 2105 01:57:50,760 --> 01:57:55,120 and trying to take tasks that humans do really well 2106 01:57:55,120 --> 01:57:57,960 and feed that data to machines 2107 01:57:57,960 --> 01:58:01,360 to let the machines do what they do really well. 2108 01:58:01,360 --> 01:58:06,200 And so, I see it as a real balancing act, a real give and take. 2109 01:58:06,200 --> 01:58:09,120 And so, there's a lot of that going on in this project, 2110 01:58:09,120 --> 01:58:13,560 and I expect it to continue long after I'm finished with it 2111 01:58:13,560 --> 01:58:16,840 and the project is up and running. 2112 01:58:16,840 --> 01:58:19,160 PATRICK: Great. Thank you. Yeah. 2113 01:58:19,160 --> 01:58:21,960 So another kind of question here that sort of relates 2114 01:58:21,960 --> 01:58:26,160 to the features on SQE 2115 01:58:26,160 --> 01:58:31,920 regards potentially using GIS analysis, 2116 01:58:31,920 --> 01:58:35,200 constructing maps with locations mentioned in the scrolls 2117 01:58:35,200 --> 01:58:38,520 or where the scrolls were found, on either end, 2118 01:58:38,520 --> 01:58:41,200 if that's incorporated at all. 2119 01:58:41,200 --> 01:58:44,840 BRONSON: So we don't have that incorporated very much. 2120 01:58:44,840 --> 01:58:49,800 I've seen some very cool stuff like this in some cuneiform, 2121 01:58:49,800 --> 01:58:53,040 some projects, digital humanities projects using cuneiform, 2122 01:58:53,040 --> 01:58:55,240 where they have tablets and you can find 2123 01:58:55,240 --> 01:58:59,800 which caches come from which, sort of, part of Iraq and so forth, 2124 01:58:59,800 --> 01:59:02,360 and Anatolia. 2125 01:59:02,360 --> 01:59:04,400 For right now, we don't, 2126 01:59:04,400 --> 01:59:08,120 except that the images, the IAA does have information 2127 01:59:08,120 --> 01:59:10,240 - metadata with their images - 2128 01:59:10,240 --> 01:59:13,200 that suggests which cave it comes from 2129 01:59:13,200 --> 01:59:15,280 or which find spot it comes from. 2130 01:59:15,280 --> 01:59:18,280 So that information is available. 2131 01:59:18,280 --> 01:59:21,960 And you should be able, if you wanted to, 2132 01:59:21,960 --> 01:59:26,160 to sort by the collection by cave, 2133 01:59:26,160 --> 01:59:30,400 get all the cave one things and all the cave seven things 2134 01:59:30,400 --> 01:59:34,320 or the cave of horrors, (INAUDIBLE) 2135 01:59:34,320 --> 01:59:38,200 Documents from my favorite cave, the cave of horrors. 2136 01:59:38,200 --> 01:59:40,240 Just 'cause of the name. 2137 01:59:40,240 --> 01:59:41,680 LAWRENCE: One last question? 2138 01:59:41,680 --> 01:59:46,200 PATRICK: Sure. Yeah. So, final question then. 2139 01:59:46,200 --> 01:59:50,120 Regards the English translation that accompanies the fragments 2140 01:59:50,120 --> 01:59:52,160 as presented here on SQE. 2141 01:59:52,160 --> 01:59:56,080 Are these taken from older editions? 2142 01:59:56,080 --> 01:59:58,080 Are they generated anew? 2143 01:59:58,080 --> 02:00:00,360 Or how is the English... ? 2144 02:00:00,360 --> 02:00:04,040 BRONSON: So right now, they're going to be done independently 2145 02:00:04,040 --> 02:00:07,000 by each scholar who's working on the edition. 2146 02:00:07,000 --> 02:00:10,520 So we have the exemplary edition. So myself and my colleagues 2147 02:00:10,520 --> 02:00:13,480 will translate the English afresh for that. 2148 02:00:13,480 --> 02:00:15,720 We don't have a source right now 2149 02:00:15,720 --> 02:00:19,120 for the English translations for every scroll. 2150 02:00:19,760 --> 02:00:24,120 This is something that we may find a way to take from somewhere else. 2151 02:00:24,120 --> 02:00:25,760 That's a possibility. 2152 02:00:25,760 --> 02:00:29,880 Also if the Qumran Wörterbuch gets an extension, 2153 02:00:29,880 --> 02:00:34,560 then English translations is the next thing that they want to work on. 2154 02:00:34,560 --> 02:00:39,280 And so, via the Qumran Wörterbuch database, it would come in to SQE. 2155 02:00:39,280 --> 02:00:42,040 So there's a couple possibilities right now 2156 02:00:42,040 --> 02:00:44,000 but we don't have anything lined up 2157 02:00:44,000 --> 02:00:46,440 for English translations for the entire corpus 2158 02:00:46,440 --> 02:00:48,240 as it stands right now. 2159 02:00:48,240 --> 02:00:50,680 Thank you. 2160 02:00:52,160 --> 02:00:54,760 LAWRENCE: Interesting presentation. 2161 02:00:54,760 --> 02:00:57,400 And we wanna thank everyone of our speakers 2162 02:00:57,400 --> 02:00:59,080 and our audience who joined with us today, 2163 02:00:59,080 --> 02:01:00,560 our staff members and everyone. 2164 02:01:00,560 --> 02:01:04,200 Hope you will be back. More of the type of thing that we were hearing. 2165 02:01:04,200 --> 02:01:07,240 We'll be having a session tomorrow starting at 9:00 2166 02:01:07,240 --> 02:01:10,200 on science, technology and the scrolls. 2167 02:01:10,200 --> 02:01:11,760 And of course, we hope you'll stay with us 2168 02:01:11,760 --> 02:01:13,400 throughout the rest of the conference. 2169 02:01:13,400 --> 02:01:16,880 Thank you very much. And have a good rest of today 2170 02:01:16,880 --> 02:01:20,680 and evening. Thank you. Bye.